
GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
2019Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 158W, a 78W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅250% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌97.5% higher power demand at 158W vs 80W.
GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
2019Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 158W, a 78W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅250% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌97.5% higher power demand at 158W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU better than GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design make more sense than Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 41 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 591 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 431 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 345 FPS | 355 FPS |
| high | 287 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 222 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 230 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 148 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 260 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 217 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 237 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 78 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design and Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1095 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,766 points.

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,130 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design scores 12,766 and the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU reaches 13,130 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 3,584 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Raw compute: 6.447 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 1095 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,766 | 13,130+3% |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2944 | 3584 ×2+22% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.447 TFLOPS | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2+67% |
| Boost Clock | 1095 MHz | 1500 MHz+37% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 184 | 224 ×2+22% |
| L1 Cache | 2.9 MB+230% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU has 28 GB. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU offers 250% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 28 GB+250% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Decoder: NVDEC 4 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU's 158W — a 65.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-49% | 158W |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 159.6+92% | 83.1 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












