
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 158W, a 78W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅250% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌97.5% higher power demand at 158W vs 80W.
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
2020Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 158W, a 78W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅250% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌97.5% higher power demand at 158W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design better than Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 35 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 41 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 252 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 605 FPS | 591 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 454 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 363 FPS | 355 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 222 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 302 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 242 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 148 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 247 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 237 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 78 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design and Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,444 points.

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,130 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design scores 13,444 and the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU reaches 13,130 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 3,584 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Raw compute: 5.914 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,444+2% | 13,130 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3584 ×2+40% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.914 TFLOPS | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2+82% |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 1500 MHz+30% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 160 | 224 ×2+40% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+184% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU has 28 GB. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU offers 250% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 28 GB+250% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th Gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU's 158W — a 65.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-49% | 158W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 168.1+102% | 83.1 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













