G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

✅5.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
✅More future proof: Turing on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 110W instead of 300W, a 190W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 16 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,299 MSRP).
❌172.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 110W.

Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)

2019

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

✅5.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
✅More future proof: Turing on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 110W instead of 300W, a 190W reduction.

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 16 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,299 MSRP).
❌172.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 110W.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) better than Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) averages 5.6% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 15,372 vs 15,633 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, DLSS 4 + Multi Frame Gen, plus much lower power draw (110W vs 300W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2018, better frame-generation support with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 12nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $2,299 MSRP. Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $2,299 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 5.6% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (15,372 vs 15,633). Moving to $2,299 MSRP gets you newer hardware, lower power draw (110W vs 300W), and DLSS 4 + Multi Frame Gen.

Is Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below an unclear MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and DLSS 4 + Multi Frame Gen.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
1080p
low	169 FPS	166 FPS
medium	150 FPS	148 FPS
high	129 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	90 FPS
1440p
low	147 FPS	146 FPS
medium	125 FPS	124 FPS
high	95 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	68 FPS	65 FPS
4K
low	70 FPS	69 FPS
medium	60 FPS	60 FPS
high	44 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	37 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
1080p
low	300 FPS	301 FPS
medium	257 FPS	255 FPS
high	217 FPS	201 FPS
ultra	184 FPS	158 FPS
1440p
low	224 FPS	203 FPS
medium	187 FPS	172 FPS
high	164 FPS	146 FPS
ultra	132 FPS	112 FPS
4K
low	113 FPS	99 FPS
medium	96 FPS	82 FPS
high	82 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	52 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
1080p
low	692 FPS	703 FPS
medium	553 FPS	563 FPS
high	461 FPS	469 FPS
ultra	346 FPS	352 FPS
1440p
low	519 FPS	528 FPS
medium	415 FPS	422 FPS
high	346 FPS	352 FPS
ultra	259 FPS	264 FPS
4K
low	346 FPS	352 FPS
medium	277 FPS	281 FPS
high	231 FPS	234 FPS
ultra	173 FPS	176 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
1080p
low	271 FPS	259 FPS
medium	236 FPS	224 FPS
high	201 FPS	190 FPS
ultra	163 FPS	153 FPS
1440p
low	207 FPS	197 FPS
medium	185 FPS	175 FPS
high	158 FPS	149 FPS
ultra	126 FPS	118 FPS
4K
low	126 FPS	121 FPS
medium	110 FPS	105 FPS
high	86 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	68 FPS	67 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) and Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)

The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,372 points.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) scores 15,372 and the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU reaches 15,633 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Raw compute: 9.492 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 1545 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
G3D Mark Score	15,372	15,633+2%
Architecture	Turing	GCN 5.0
Process Node	12 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	3072	3584 ×2+17%
Compute (TFLOPS)	9.492 TFLOPS	10.75 TFLOPS ×2+13%
Boost Clock	1545 MHz+3%	1500 MHz
ROPs	64	64 ×2
TMUs	192	224 ×2+17%
L1 Cache	3 MB+241%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 4 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 4)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has 32 GB. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
VRAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU).

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Encoder	NVENC 7.0	VCN 3.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP10	VCN 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) draws 110W versus the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU's 300W — a 92.7% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) vs 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
TDP	110W-63%	300W
Recommended PSU	650W	650W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	85°C	75°C-12%
Perf/Watt	139.7+168%	52.1