G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro P6000

2016

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 250W instead of 300W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 23 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 23 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

✅36.5% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 23 GB).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro P6000: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro P6000 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
❌20% higher power demand at 300W vs 250W.

Quadro P6000

2016

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 250W instead of 300W, a 50W reduction.

Why buy it

✅36.5% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 23 GB).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro P6000: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro P6000 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 23 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 23 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
❌20% higher power demand at 300W vs 250W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU better than Quadro P6000?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 15,512 vs 15,633 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, FSR upscaling.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2018 generation instead of 2016, more VRAM at 32 GB instead of 23 GB, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 14nm process instead of 16nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $5,999 MSRP, and you are getting 0.8% higher G3D Mark. Quadro P6000 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Quadro P6000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Quadro P6000 is 2016 hardware with 23 GB of VRAM, 15,512 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P6000 Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro P6000	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
1080p
low	197 FPS	166 FPS
medium	183 FPS	148 FPS
high	159 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	145 FPS	90 FPS
1440p
low	182 FPS	146 FPS
medium	153 FPS	124 FPS
high	125 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	116 FPS	65 FPS
4K
low	114 FPS	69 FPS
medium	96 FPS	60 FPS
high	73 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	37 FPS

Open Quadro P6000 Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro P6000	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
1080p
low	355 FPS	301 FPS
medium	306 FPS	255 FPS
high	227 FPS	201 FPS
ultra	182 FPS	158 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	203 FPS
medium	193 FPS	172 FPS
high	156 FPS	146 FPS
ultra	125 FPS	112 FPS
4K
low	109 FPS	99 FPS
medium	91 FPS	82 FPS
high	76 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	52 FPS

Open Quadro P6000 Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro P6000	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
1080p
low	698 FPS	703 FPS
medium	558 FPS	563 FPS
high	465 FPS	469 FPS
ultra	349 FPS	352 FPS
1440p
low	524 FPS	528 FPS
medium	419 FPS	422 FPS
high	349 FPS	352 FPS
ultra	262 FPS	264 FPS
4K
low	349 FPS	352 FPS
medium	279 FPS	281 FPS
high	233 FPS	234 FPS
ultra	175 FPS	176 FPS

Open Quadro P6000 Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro P6000	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
1080p
low	520 FPS	259 FPS
medium	451 FPS	224 FPS
high	387 FPS	190 FPS
ultra	319 FPS	153 FPS
1440p
low	422 FPS	197 FPS
medium	367 FPS	175 FPS
high	300 FPS	149 FPS
ultra	245 FPS	118 FPS
4K
low	260 FPS	121 FPS
medium	247 FPS	105 FPS
high	215 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	175 FPS	67 FPS

Open Quadro P6000 Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P6000 and Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

Quadro P6000

The Quadro P6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,512 points. Launch price was $5,999.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P6000 scores 15,512 and the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU reaches 15,633 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P6000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Quadro P6000) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Raw compute: 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P6000) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P6000	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
G3D Mark Score	15,512	15,633
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 5.0
Process Node	16 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	3840+7%	3584 ×2
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.63 TFLOPS+17%	10.75 TFLOPS ×2
Boost Clock	1645 MHz+10%	1500 MHz
ROPs	96+50%	64 ×2
TMUs	240+7%	224 ×2
L1 Cache	1.4 MB+59%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB	4 MB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P6000	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P6000 comes with 23 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has 32 GB. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU offers 36.5% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro P6000) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) — the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P6000	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
VRAM Capacity	23.438 GB	32 GB+37%
Memory Type	GDDR5X	GDDR6
Bus Width	384-bit+200%	128-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB	4 MB+33%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P6000) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	Quadro P6000	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
DirectX	12.1	12.2
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Quadro P6000) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU).

Feature	Quadro P6000	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Encoder	NVENC 5.0 (2x)	VCN 3.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP8	VCN 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P6000 draws 250W versus the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU's 300W — a 18.2% difference. The Quadro P6000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro P6000) vs 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Quadro P6000	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
TDP	250W-17%	300W
Recommended PSU	650W	650W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	85°C	75°C-12%
Perf/Watt	62.0+19%	52.1