
Quadro P4200 Max-Q
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 580
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P4200 Max-Q
2018Why buy it
- ✅7.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro 580: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro 580 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Radeon Pro 580
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P4200 Max-Q across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.
Quadro P4200 Max-Q
2018Radeon Pro 580
2017Why buy it
- ✅7.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro 580: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro 580 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P4200 Max-Q across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro P4200 Max-Q better than Radeon Pro 580?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 580 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 37 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 209 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P4200 Max-Q and Radeon Pro 580

Quadro P4200 Max-Q
Quadro P4200 Max-Q
The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,800 points.

Radeon Pro 580
Radeon Pro 580
The Radeon Pro 580 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,753 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P4200 Max-Q scores 7,800 and the Radeon Pro 580 reaches 7,753 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro 580 uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 580). Raw compute: 6.82 TFLOPS (Quadro P4200 Max-Q) vs 5.53 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 580). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,800 | 7,753 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.82 TFLOPS+23% | 5.53 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1480 MHz+23% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 144 | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 864 KB+50% | 576 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro 580). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 580). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 580).
| Feature | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P4200 Max-Q draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro 580's 150W — a 40% difference. The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P4200 Max-Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 580). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-33% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 78.0+51% | 51.7 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $500 |
| Codename | GP104 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | February 21 2018 | June 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #234 | #327 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












