
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+78.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 78.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 24.9 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌69.2% higher power demand at 220W vs 130W.
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 220W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,442 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌0.2% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.9 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Radeon Pro 5700 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅+78.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 78.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 24.9 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 220W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌69.2% higher power demand at 220W vs 130W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,442 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌0.2% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.9 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Radeon Pro 5700 XT?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 5700 XT still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 64 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 41 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 280 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 280 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 140 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 217 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 95 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon Pro 5700 XT

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1499 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,442 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon Pro 5700 XT's 12,442 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 78.2%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 7.675 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1499 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+78% | 12,442 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+130% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+165% | 7.675 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+15% | 1499 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+15% | 160 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs RDNA 1.0 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs Unified Video Decoder 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | RDNA 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | Unified Video Decoder 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon Pro 5700 XT's 130W — a 51.4% difference. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 130W-41% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+5% | 95.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT launched at $500. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 0.2% less ($1 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 24.9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 78.3% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+78% | 24.9 |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 10 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #63 | #215 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












