G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX TITAN X

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
99.8% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 24.9 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
❌92.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 130W.

Radeon Pro 5700 XT

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $499 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 97% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.9 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 130W instead of 250W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

GeForce GTX TITAN X

2015

Radeon Pro 5700 XT

2020

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Why buy it

✅Costs $499 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 97% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.9 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 130W instead of 250W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
99.8% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 24.9 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
❌92.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 130W.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX TITAN X better than Radeon Pro 5700 XT?

Yes. GeForce GTX TITAN X is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 12,621 vs 12,442 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX TITAN X is a 2015 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon Pro 5700 XT is a 2020 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro 5700 XT is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2015, more VRAM at 16 GB instead of 12 GB, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 7nm process instead of 28nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX TITAN X is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX TITAN X is about 99.8% more expensive on MSRP at $999 MSRP versus $500 MSRP, and you are getting 1.4% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro 5700 XT really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does Radeon Pro 5700 XT make more sense than GeForce GTX TITAN X?

Yes. Radeon Pro 5700 XT is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (130W vs 250W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $500 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX TITAN X. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX TITAN X currently gives you 1.4% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro 5700 XT still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX TITAN X Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro 5700 XT Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX TITAN X	Radeon Pro 5700 XT
1080p
low	154 FPS	240 FPS
medium	133 FPS	227 FPS
high	112 FPS	189 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	150 FPS
1440p
low	124 FPS	222 FPS
medium	106 FPS	188 FPS
high	81 FPS	145 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	116 FPS
4K
low	42 FPS	117 FPS
medium	38 FPS	98 FPS
high	24 FPS	71 FPS
ultra	20 FPS	64 FPS

Open GeForce GTX TITAN X Open Radeon Pro 5700 XT

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX TITAN X	Radeon Pro 5700 XT
1080p
low	187 FPS	231 FPS
medium	166 FPS	193 FPS
high	135 FPS	147 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	111 FPS
1440p
low	128 FPS	150 FPS
medium	104 FPS	125 FPS
high	82 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	75 FPS
4K
low	60 FPS	79 FPS
medium	50 FPS	66 FPS
high	46 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	41 FPS

Open GeForce GTX TITAN X Open Radeon Pro 5700 XT

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX TITAN X	Radeon Pro 5700 XT
1080p
low	568 FPS	560 FPS
medium	454 FPS	448 FPS
high	379 FPS	373 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	280 FPS
1440p
low	426 FPS	420 FPS
medium	341 FPS	336 FPS
high	284 FPS	280 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	210 FPS
4K
low	284 FPS	280 FPS
medium	227 FPS	224 FPS
high	189 FPS	187 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	140 FPS

Open GeForce GTX TITAN X Open Radeon Pro 5700 XT

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX TITAN X	Radeon Pro 5700 XT
1080p
low	235 FPS	383 FPS
medium	204 FPS	329 FPS
high	167 FPS	276 FPS
ultra	140 FPS	217 FPS
1440p
low	179 FPS	305 FPS
medium	157 FPS	265 FPS
high	125 FPS	206 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	157 FPS
4K
low	102 FPS	164 FPS
medium	83 FPS	131 FPS
high	67 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	53 FPS	95 FPS

Open GeForce GTX TITAN X Open Radeon Pro 5700 XT

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN X and Radeon Pro 5700 XT

GeForce GTX TITAN X

The GeForce GTX TITAN X is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,621 points. Launch price was $999.

Radeon Pro 5700 XT

The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1499 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,442 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX TITAN X scores 12,621 and the Radeon Pro 5700 XT reaches 12,442 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN X is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Raw compute: 6.691 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 7.675 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 1499 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN X	Radeon Pro 5700 XT
G3D Mark Score	12,621+1%	12,442
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	3072+20%	2560
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.691 TFLOPS	7.675 TFLOPS+15%
Boost Clock	1075 MHz	1499 MHz+39%
ROPs	96+50%	64
TMUs	192+20%	160
L2 Cache	3 MB	4 MB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX TITAN X gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN X	Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX TITAN X comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) — the Radeon Pro 5700 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN X	Radeon Pro 5700 XT
VRAM Capacity	12 GB	16 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	384-bit+200%	128-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB	4 MB+33%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN X	Radeon Pro 5700 XT
DirectX	12 (FL 12_1)	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs RDNA 1.0 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd gen vs Unified Video Decoder 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT).

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN X	Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Encoder	NVENC 2nd gen	RDNA 1.0
Decoder	NVDEC 2nd gen	Unified Video Decoder 7.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX TITAN X draws 250W versus the Radeon Pro 5700 XT's 130W — a 63.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 83°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN X	Radeon Pro 5700 XT
TDP	250W	130W-48%
Recommended PSU	600W	500W-17%
Power Connector	6-pin + 8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	83°C	75°C-10%
Perf/Watt	50.5	95.7+90%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX TITAN X launched at $999 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT launched at $500. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT costs 49.9% less ($499 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.6 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 24.9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) — the Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 97.6% better value. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).