
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5300M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 85W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon Pro 5300M
2019Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌183.3% higher power demand at 85W vs 30W.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
2023Radeon Pro 5300M
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 85W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌183.3% higher power demand at 85W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
So, is Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS better than Radeon Pro 5300M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro 5300M make more sense than Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 35 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 14 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 62 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS and Radeon Pro 5300M
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in October 26 2023. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points.

Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M
The Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,853 points.
Graphics Performance
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS scores 6,000 and the Radeon Pro 5300M reaches 5,853 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 1,536 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 1250 MHz.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,000+3% | 5,853 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+20% | 1280 |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5300M has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro 5300M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS draws 30W versus the Radeon Pro 5300M's 85W — a 95.7% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5300M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-65% | 85W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 200.0+190% | 68.9 |
Value Analysis
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Codename | — | Navi 14 |
| Release | October 26 2023 | November 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #459 | #403 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













