
Quadro M5000M
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro M5000M
2015Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌17.6% higher power demand at 100W vs 85W.
Radeon Pro 5300
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 100W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro M5000M
2015Radeon Pro 5300
2020Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 100W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌17.6% higher power demand at 100W vs 85W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro 5300 better than Quadro M5000M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro M5000M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro M5000M | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro M5000M | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 14 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro M5000M | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 256 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 62 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro M5000M | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 34 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M5000M and Radeon Pro 5300

Quadro M5000M
Quadro M5000M
The Quadro M5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1051 MHz. It has 1,536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,056 points.

Radeon Pro 5300
Radeon Pro 5300
The Radeon Pro 5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,125 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M5000M scores 7,056 and the Radeon Pro 5300 reaches 7,125 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M5000M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 5300 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M5000M) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300). Raw compute: 2.995 TFLOPS (Quadro M5000M) vs 4.224 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300). Boost clocks: 1051 MHz vs 1650 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M5000M | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,056 | 7,125 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1,536+20% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.995 TFLOPS | 4.224 TFLOPS+41% |
| Boost Clock | 1051 MHz | 1650 MHz+57% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+20% | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M5000M | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M5000M comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5300 has 4 GB. The Quadro M5000M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro M5000M | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro M5000M) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5300). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro M5000M | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (Quadro M5000M) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5300). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro M5000M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5300).
| Feature | Quadro M5000M | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M5000M draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro 5300's 85W — a 16.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 5300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M5000M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro M5000M | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 85W-15% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 70.6 | 83.8+19% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 5300 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro M5000M | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $300 |
| Codename | GM204 | Navi 14 |
| Release | August 18 2015 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #353 | #351 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












