
Radeon HD 7750
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M375X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon HD 7750
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $141 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 128.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.6 vs 6.8 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 75W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon R9 M375X
2015Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌129.4% HIGHER MSRP$250 MSRPvs$109 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.8 vs 15.6 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 55W.
Radeon HD 7750
2012Radeon R9 M375X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $141 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 128.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.6 vs 6.8 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 75W, a 20W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌129.4% HIGHER MSRP$250 MSRPvs$109 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.8 vs 15.6 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 55W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 M375X better than Radeon HD 7750?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon HD 7750 make more sense than Radeon R9 M375X?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 7750 | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 19 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 12 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 7750 | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 54 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 17 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 7 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 8 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon HD 7750 | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon HD 7750 | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 31 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 14 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7750 and Radeon R9 M375X

Radeon HD 7750
Radeon HD 7750
The Radeon HD 7750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 15 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,703 points. Launch price was $109.

Radeon R9 M375X
Radeon R9 M375X
The Radeon R9 M375X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1015 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,711 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7750 scores 1,703 and the Radeon R9 M375X reaches 1,711 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7750 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M375X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon HD 7750) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M375X). Raw compute: 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7750) vs 1.299 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M375X). Boost clocks: 800 MHz vs 1015 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,703 | 1,711 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 640+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8192 TFLOPS | 1.299 TFLOPS+59% |
| Boost Clock | 800 MHz | 1015 MHz+27% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 160 KB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 72 GB/s (Radeon HD 7750) vs 80 GB/s (Radeon R9 M375X) — a 11.1% advantage for the Radeon R9 M375X. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 80 GB/s+11% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7750 draws 55W versus the Radeon R9 M375X's 75W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon HD 7750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon HD 7750) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M375X). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-27% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 31.0+36% | 22.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7750 launched at $109 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M375X launched at $250. The Radeon HD 7750 costs 56.4% less ($141 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.6 (Radeon HD 7750) vs 6.8 (Radeon R9 M375X) — the Radeon HD 7750 offers 129.4% better value. The Radeon R9 M375X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $109-56% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.6+129% | 6.8 |
| Codename | Cape Verde | Tropo |
| Release | February 15 2012 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #731 | #727 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













