
Radeon HD 7750
Popular choices:

Radeon R7 M380
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon HD 7750
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $191 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 180.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.6 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 75W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon R7 M380
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌175.2% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$109 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 15.6 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 55W.
Radeon HD 7750
2012Radeon R7 M380
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $191 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 180.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.6 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 75W, a 20W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌175.2% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$109 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 15.6 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 55W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon HD 7750 better than Radeon R7 M380?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon R7 M380 make more sense than Radeon HD 7750?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 7750 | Radeon R7 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 19 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 12 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 7750 | Radeon R7 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 54 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 17 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 7 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon HD 7750 | Radeon R7 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon HD 7750 | Radeon R7 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 31 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7750 and Radeon R7 M380

Radeon HD 7750
Radeon HD 7750
The Radeon HD 7750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 15 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,703 points. Launch price was $109.

Radeon R7 M380
Radeon R7 M380
The Radeon R7 M380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 915 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,669 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7750 scores 1,703 and the Radeon R7 M380 reaches 1,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7750 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 M380 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon HD 7750) vs 640 (Radeon R7 M380). Raw compute: 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7750) vs 1.171 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M380). Boost clocks: 800 MHz vs 915 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | Radeon R7 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,703+2% | 1,669 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 640+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8192 TFLOPS | 1.171 TFLOPS+43% |
| Boost Clock | 800 MHz | 915 MHz+14% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 160 KB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | Radeon R7 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 7750 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M380 has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 7750 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | Radeon R7 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 72 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon HD 7750) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R7 M380). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | Radeon R7 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7750) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 M380). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 7750) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 M380).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | Radeon R7 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3.1 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7750 draws 55W versus the Radeon R7 M380's 75W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon HD 7750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon HD 7750) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M380). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | Radeon R7 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-27% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 31.0+39% | 22.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7750 launched at $109 MSRP, while the Radeon R7 M380 launched at $300. The Radeon HD 7750 costs 63.7% less ($191 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.6 (Radeon HD 7750) vs 5.6 (Radeon R7 M380) — the Radeon HD 7750 offers 178.6% better value. The Radeon R7 M380 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7750 | Radeon R7 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $109-64% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.6+179% | 5.6 |
| Codename | Cape Verde | Tropo |
| Release | February 15 2012 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #731 | #737 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













