
Quadro M500M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 5750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro M500M
2016Why buy it
- ✅38.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 86W, a 56W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
Radeon HD 5750
2009Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M500M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2009-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌186.7% higher power demand at 86W vs 30W.
Quadro M500M
2016Radeon HD 5750
2009Why buy it
- ✅38.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 86W, a 56W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M500M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2009-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌186.7% higher power demand at 86W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro M500M better than Radeon HD 5750?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 5750 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro M500M | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 7 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 16 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 7 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro M500M | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 20 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 7 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 2 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 1 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro M500M | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro M500M | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 7 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M500M and Radeon HD 5750

Quadro M500M
Quadro M500M
The Quadro M500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 27 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.

Radeon HD 5750
Radeon HD 5750
The Radeon HD 5750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M500M scores 1,172 and the Radeon HD 5750 reaches 1,169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M500M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 5750 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro M500M) vs 720 (Radeon HD 5750). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro M500M) vs 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5750).
| Feature | Quadro M500M | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,172 | 1,169 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 720+88% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS | 1.008 TFLOPS+17% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 16 | 36+125% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+78% | 72 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M500M | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M500M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5750 has 1 GB. The Quadro M500M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro M500M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 5750) — the Quadro M500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M500M | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+100% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M500M draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 5750's 86W — a 96.6% difference. The Quadro M500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M500M) vs 450W (Radeon HD 5750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro M500M | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-65% | 86W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1+188% | 13.6 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M500M is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2009).
| Feature | Quadro M500M | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $130 |
| Codename | GM108 | Juniper |
| Release | April 27 2016 | October 13 2009 |
| Ranking | #833 | #834 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













