
Radeon 890M
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 290 / 390
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon 890M
2024Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 300W, a 285W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 290 / 390 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 24.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Radeon R9 290 / 390
2015Why buy it
- ✅18.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1900% higher power demand at 300W vs 15W.
Radeon 890M
2024Radeon R9 290 / 390
2015Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 300W, a 285W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅18.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 290 / 390 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 24.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1900% higher power demand at 300W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon 890M better than Radeon R9 290 / 390?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 290 / 390 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon 890M | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon 890M | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 35 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon 890M | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 293 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 92 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon 890M | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 890M and Radeon R9 290 / 390

Radeon 890M
Radeon 890M
The Radeon 890M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,175 points.

Radeon R9 290 / 390
Radeon R9 290 / 390
The Radeon R9 290 / 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,150 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 890M scores 8,175 and the Radeon R9 290 / 390 reaches 8,150 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 890M is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon R9 290 / 390 uses GCN 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon 890M) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Raw compute: 5.939 TFLOPS (Radeon 890M) vs 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,175 | 8,150 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2560+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.939 TFLOPS+16% | 5.12 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+190% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 160+150% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 640 KB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 890M) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 290 / 390) — the Radeon 890M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 320 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 512-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 890M) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon 890M) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon 890M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290 / 390).
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 890M draws 15W versus the Radeon R9 290 / 390's 300W — a 181% difference. The Radeon 890M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon 890M) vs 750W (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 275mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-95% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-33% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 275mm |
| Height | 0mm | 109mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 95°C |
| Perf/Watt | 545.0+1904% | 27.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 890M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $329 |
| Codename | Strix Point | Grenada |
| Release | July 15 2024 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #312 | #296 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













