
Quadro P4200 Max-Q
Popular choices:

Radeon 880M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P4200 Max-Q
2018Why buy it
- ✅85.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 15W.
Radeon 880M
2024Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 100W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P4200 Max-Q across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quadro P4200 Max-Q
2018Radeon 880M
2024Why buy it
- ✅85.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 100W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P4200 Max-Q across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro P4200 Max-Q better than Radeon 880M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon 880M make more sense than Quadro P4200 Max-Q?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | Radeon 880M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | Radeon 880M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | Radeon 880M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 57 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | Radeon 880M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P4200 Max-Q and Radeon 880M

Quadro P4200 Max-Q
Quadro P4200 Max-Q
The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,800 points.

Radeon 880M
Radeon 880M
The Radeon 880M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,729 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P4200 Max-Q scores 7,800 and the Radeon 880M reaches 7,729 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the Radeon 880M uses RDNA 3.5, both on 16 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q) vs 768 (Radeon 880M). Raw compute: 6.82 TFLOPS (Quadro P4200 Max-Q) vs 4.454 TFLOPS (Radeon 880M). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 2900 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | Radeon 880M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,800 | 7,729 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+200% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.82 TFLOPS+53% | 4.454 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1480 MHz | 2900 MHz+96% |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 144+200% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 864 KB+575% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | Radeon 880M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | Radeon 880M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q) vs 12.2 (Radeon 880M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | Radeon 880M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q) vs VCN 4.5 (Radeon 880M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs VCN 4.5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 880M).
| Feature | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | Radeon 880M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | VCN 4.5 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | VCN 4.5 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P4200 Max-Q draws 100W versus the Radeon 880M's 15W — a 147.8% difference. The Radeon 880M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P4200 Max-Q) vs 350W (Radeon 880M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | Radeon 880M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 15W-85% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 78.0 | 515.3+561% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












