
Quadro
Popular choices:

Radeon 860M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro
1999Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon 860M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 1999-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
Radeon 860M
2025Why buy it
- ✅30.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
Quadro
1999Radeon 860M
2025Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅30.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon 860M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 1999-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon 860M better than Quadro?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 15 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 12 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 9 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 18 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 1 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 180 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 49 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 27 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro and Radeon 860M

Quadro
Quadro
The Quadro is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 1999. It features the Celsius architecture. The core clock speed is 135 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 220 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

Radeon 860M
Radeon 860M
The Radeon 860M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Marchar 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 3000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,838 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro scores 5,000 and the Radeon 860M reaches 4,838 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro is built on Celsius while the Radeon 860M uses RDNA 3.5, both on 220 nm vs 4 nm.
| Feature | Quadro | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,000+3% | 4,838 |
| Architecture | Celsius | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 220 nm | 4 nm |
| ROPs | 4 | 8+100% |
| TMUs | 4 | 32+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro draws 75W versus the Radeon 860M's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 860M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro) vs 350W (Radeon 860M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 66.7 | 322.5+384% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 860M is the newer GPU (2025 vs 1999).
| Feature | Quadro | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | — |
| Codename | NV10 | Krackan Point |
| Release | 1999 | Marchar 2025 |
| Ranking | #900 | #449 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













