
GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:

Radeon 8040S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
2017Why buy it
- ✅59.0% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 24.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ❌109.1% higher power demand at 115W vs 55W.
Radeon 8040S
2025Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 115W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
2017Radeon 8040S
2025Why buy it
- ✅59.0% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 115W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 24.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ❌109.1% higher power demand at 115W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design better than Radeon 8040S?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon 8040S make more sense than GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 443 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 177 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 57 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 296 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 260 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 121 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 46 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design and Radeon 8040S

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1379 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,842 points.

Radeon 8040S
Radeon 8040S
The Radeon 8040S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,756 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design scores 9,842 and the Radeon 8040S reaches 9,756 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is built on Pascal while the Radeon 8040S uses RDNA 3.5, both on 16 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 1,024 (Radeon 8040S). Raw compute: 5.648 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 5.734 TFLOPS (Radeon 8040S). Boost clocks: 1379 MHz vs 2800 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,842 | 9,756 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+100% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.648 TFLOPS | 5.734 TFLOPS+2% |
| Boost Clock | 1379 MHz | 2800 MHz+103% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 8040S relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 8040S has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 8 MB (Radeon 8040S) — the Radeon 8040S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.2 (Radeon 8040S). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs VCN 4.5 (Radeon 8040S). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs VCN 4.5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 8040S).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | VCN 4.5 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | VCN 4.5 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design draws 115W versus the Radeon 8040S's 55W — a 70.6% difference. The Radeon 8040S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Radeon 8040S). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 55W-52% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 85.6 | 177.4+107% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 8040S is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $400 |
| Codename | GP104 | Strix Halo |
| Release | June 27 2017 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #358 | #265 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













