
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 8000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+11.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $9,500 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2129.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 8000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quadro RTX 8000
2018Why buy it
- ✅17.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅213% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 184).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (19,927 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 48 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌1903.8% HIGHER MSRP$9,999 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Quadro RTX 8000
2018Why buy it
- ✅+11.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $9,500 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2129.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅17.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅213% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 184).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 8000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (19,927 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 48 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌1903.8% HIGHER MSRP$9,999 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Quadro RTX 8000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro RTX 8000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 70 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 289 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 325 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 90 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 897 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 717 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 598 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 448 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 673 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 538 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 299 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 224 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 673 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 605 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 515 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 448 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 418 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 355 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 224 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Quadro RTX 8000

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Quadro RTX 8000
Quadro RTX 8000
The Quadro RTX 8000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,927 points. Launch price was $9,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Quadro RTX 8000's 19,927 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 11.3%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Quadro RTX 8000 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 4,608 (Quadro RTX 8000). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 8000). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 72 (Quadro RTX 8000) with 184 Tensor cores vs 576.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+11% | 19,927 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+28% | 4608 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+25% | 16.31 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1770 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 184 | 288+57% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+29% | 4.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 72+57% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 576+213% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The Quadro RTX 8000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 8000 has 48 GB. The Quadro RTX 8000 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 8000) — a 71.4% advantage for the Quadro RTX 8000. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX 8000) — the Quadro RTX 8000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 48 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 768 GB/s+71% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 8000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 8000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs PureVideo HD VP10. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 8000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | PureVideo HD VP10 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Quadro RTX 8000's 260W — a 16.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 8000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-15% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+32% | 76.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Quadro RTX 8000 launched at $9999. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 95% less ($9500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 2120% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-95% | $9999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+2120% | 2.0 |
| Codename | GA104 | TU102 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #63 | #78 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












