
L40S
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 8000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
L40S
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,499 less on MSRP ($7,500 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($7,500 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌15.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 260W.
Quadro RTX 8000
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 260W instead of 300W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 48 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌33.3% HIGHER MSRP$9,999 MSRPvs$7,500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
L40S
2022Quadro RTX 8000
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,499 less on MSRP ($7,500 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($7,500 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 260W instead of 300W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌15.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 260W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 48 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌33.3% HIGHER MSRP$9,999 MSRPvs$7,500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is L40S better than Quadro RTX 8000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro RTX 8000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | L40S | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 256 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 256 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 70 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | L40S | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 784 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 629 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 478 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 289 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 325 FPS |
| medium | 528 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 240 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 90 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | L40S | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 901 FPS | 897 FPS |
| medium | 721 FPS | 717 FPS |
| high | 601 FPS | 598 FPS |
| ultra | 451 FPS | 448 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 676 FPS | 673 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 538 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 338 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 451 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 299 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 224 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | L40S | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 483 FPS | 673 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 605 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 515 FPS |
| ultra | 288 FPS | 448 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 312 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 418 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 224 FPS | 355 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 224 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of L40S and Quadro RTX 8000

L40S
L40S
The L40S is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 13 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,023 points.

Quadro RTX 8000
Quadro RTX 8000
The Quadro RTX 8000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,927 points. Launch price was $9,999.
Graphics Performance
The L40S scores 20,023 and the Quadro RTX 8000 reaches 19,927 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The L40S is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro RTX 8000 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 18,176 (L40S) vs 4,608 (Quadro RTX 8000). Raw compute: 91.61 TFLOPS (L40S) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 8000). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 142 RT cores (L40S) vs 72 (Quadro RTX 8000) with 568 Tensor cores vs 576.
| Feature | L40S | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,023 | 19,927 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 18176+294% | 4608 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 91.61 TFLOPS+462% | 16.31 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2520 MHz+42% | 1770 MHz |
| ROPs | 192+100% | 96 |
| TMUs | 568+97% | 288 |
| L1 Cache | 17.8 MB+296% | 4.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 142+97% | 72 |
| Tensor Cores | 568 | 576+1% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The Quadro RTX 8000 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The L40S relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | L40S | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 48 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 960 GB/s (L40S) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 8000) — a 25% advantage for the L40S. Bus width: 384-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (L40S) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX 8000) — the L40S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | L40S | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB | 48 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 960 GB/s+25% | 768 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (L40S) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 8000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | L40S | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th Gen (L40S) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 8000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs PureVideo HD VP10. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1 (L40S) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 8000).
| Feature | L40S | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th Gen | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | PureVideo HD VP10 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The L40S draws 300W versus the Quadro RTX 8000's 260W — a 14.3% difference. The Quadro RTX 8000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 800W (L40S) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 8000). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | L40S | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 260W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 800W | 650W-19% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 66.7 | 76.6+15% |
Value Analysis
The L40S launched at $7500 MSRP, while the Quadro RTX 8000 launched at $9999. The L40S costs 25% less ($2499 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (L40S) vs 2.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) — the L40S offers 35% better value. The L40S is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2018).
| Feature | L40S | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7500-25% | $9999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7+35% | 2.0 |
| Codename | AD102 | TU102 |
| Release | October 13 2022 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #76 | #78 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












