
GeForce GTX 1080
Popular choices:

Quadro P6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1080
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,400 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 907.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.1 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 250W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 23 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quadro P6000
2016Why buy it
- ✅193% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (23 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 23 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌901.5% HIGHER MSRP$5,999 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 26.1 G3D/$ ($5,999 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌38.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 180W.
GeForce GTX 1080
2016Quadro P6000
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,400 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 907.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.1 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 250W, a 70W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅193% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (23 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 23 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 23 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌901.5% HIGHER MSRP$5,999 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 26.1 G3D/$ ($5,999 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌38.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 180W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1080 better than Quadro P6000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P6000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 72 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 289 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 242 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 702 FPS | 698 FPS |
| medium | 562 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 468 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 527 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 175 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 399 FPS | 566 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 492 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 418 FPS |
| ultra | 241 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 452 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 319 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 175 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1080 and Quadro P6000

GeForce GTX 1080
GeForce GTX 1080
The GeForce GTX 1080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,609 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro P6000
Quadro P6000
The Quadro P6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,512 points. Launch price was $5,999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1080 scores 15,609 and the Quadro P6000 reaches 15,512 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1080 is built on Pascal while the Quadro P6000 uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 3,840 (Quadro P6000). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P6000). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,609 | 15,512 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3840+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 12.63 TFLOPS+42% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+5% | 1645 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 240+50% |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 1.4 MB+49% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1080 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P6000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1080 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P6000 has 23 GB. The Quadro P6000 offers 193% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 432 GB/s (Quadro P6000) — a 35% advantage for the Quadro P6000. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 3 MB (Quadro P6000) — the Quadro P6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 23.438 GB+193% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 432 GB/s+35% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 12.1 (Quadro P6000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1080) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Quadro P6000). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P6000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th gen | NVENC 5.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1080 draws 180W versus the Quadro P6000's 250W — a 32.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1080 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 650W (Quadro P6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-28% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 86.7+40% | 62.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1080 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Quadro P6000 launched at $5999. The GeForce GTX 1080 costs 90% less ($5400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 26.1 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 2.6 (Quadro P6000) — the GeForce GTX 1080 offers 903.8% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-90% | $5999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.1+904% | 2.6 |
| Codename | GP104 | GP102 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #137 | #141 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













