
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Quadro P5200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+90.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 90.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 23.3 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌120% higher power demand at 220W vs 100W.
Quadro P5200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 220W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,650 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌0.2% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Quadro P5200
2018Why buy it
- ✅+90.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 90.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 23.3 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 220W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌120% higher power demand at 220W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,650 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌0.2% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Quadro P5200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P5200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 52 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 131 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 208 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 77 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Quadro P5200

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Quadro P5200
Quadro P5200
The Quadro P5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1556 MHz to 1746 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,650 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Quadro P5200's 11,650 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 90.3%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Quadro P5200 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2,560 (Quadro P5200). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 8.94 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1746 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+90% | 11,650 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+130% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+127% | 8.94 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1746 MHz+1% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+15% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+517% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P5200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5200 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2 MB (Quadro P5200) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5200). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 5.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | PureVideo HD VP7 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Quadro P5200's 100W — a 75% difference. The Quadro P5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 500W (Quadro P5200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 100W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 116.5+16% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Quadro P5200 launched at $500. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 0.2% less ($1 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 23.3 (Quadro P5200) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 90.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+91% | 23.3 |
| Codename | GA104 | GP104 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #63 | #230 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












