
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Quadro P5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+74.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,000 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 772.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌22.2% higher power demand at 220W vs 180W.
Quadro P5000
2016Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 220W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,728 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌400.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Quadro P5000
2016Why buy it
- ✅+74.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,000 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 772.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 220W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌22.2% higher power demand at 220W vs 180W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,728 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌400.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Quadro P5000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P5000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 252 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 77 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 573 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 344 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 143 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 300 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 111 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Quadro P5000

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Quadro P5000
Quadro P5000
The Quadro P5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,728 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Quadro P5000's 12,728 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 74.2%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Quadro P5000 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2,048 (Quadro P5000). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+74% | 12,728 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+188% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+129% | 8.873 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1733 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+15% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+517% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P5000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5000 has 16 GB. The Quadro P5000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 288 GB/s (Quadro P5000) — a 55.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2 MB (Quadro P5000) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+56% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+40% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Quadro P5000's 180W — a 20% difference. The Quadro P5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 500W (Quadro P5000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 180W-18% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+43% | 70.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Quadro P5000 launched at $2499. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 80% less ($2000 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 5.1 (Quadro P5000) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 770.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-80% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+771% | 5.1 |
| Codename | GA104 | GP104 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #63 | #206 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












