
GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:

Quadro P5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
2019Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 180W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
Quadro P5000
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌125% higher power demand at 180W vs 80W.
GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
2019Quadro P5000
2016Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 180W, a 100W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌125% higher power demand at 180W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design better than Quadro P5000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P5000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 252 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 77 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 573 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 431 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 345 FPS | 344 FPS |
| high | 287 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 230 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 260 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 217 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 300 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 111 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design and Quadro P5000

GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1095 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,766 points.

Quadro P5000
Quadro P5000
The Quadro P5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,728 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design scores 12,766 and the Quadro P5000 reaches 12,728 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Quadro P5000 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 2,048 (Quadro P5000). Raw compute: 6.447 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000). Boost clocks: 1095 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,766 | 12,728 |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2944+44% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.447 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+38% |
| Boost Clock | 1095 MHz | 1733 MHz+58% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+15% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 2.9 MB+209% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P5000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5000 has 16 GB. The Quadro P5000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 384 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 288 GB/s (Quadro P5000) — a 33.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 2 MB (Quadro P5000) — the GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 384 GB/s+33% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+30% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000). Decoder: NVDEC 4 vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6 | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4 | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Quadro P5000's 180W — a 76.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Quadro P5000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-56% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 159.6+126% | 70.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2499 |
| Codename | TU104B | GP104 |
| Release | January 29 2019 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #174 | #206 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












