G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3070

2020

Why buy it

✅45.3% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $4,500 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1810.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quadro M6000 24GB

2016

Why buy it

✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
901.8% HIGHER MSRP
$4,999 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3070

2020

Quadro M6000 24GB

2016

Why buy it

✅45.3% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $4,500 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1810.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
901.8% HIGHER MSRP
$4,999 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Quadro M6000 24GB?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3070 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 3070 averages 45.3% more FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 22,172 vs 11,625 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3070 is a 2020 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Quadro M6000 24GB is a 2016 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2016, 90.7% more raw performance headroom, better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 8nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3070 is about $4,500 cheaper on MSRP at $499 MSRP versus $4,999 MSRP, and you are getting 45.3% more estimated average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data and 90.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 1810.7%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro M6000 24GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro M6000 24GB is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $4,999 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3070 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3070 Benchmark Check

Quadro M6000 24GB Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro M6000 24GB
1080p
low	158 FPS	160 FPS
medium	140 FPS	142 FPS
high	123 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	86 FPS
1440p
low	134 FPS	140 FPS
medium	109 FPS	120 FPS
high	96 FPS	86 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	61 FPS
4K
low	80 FPS	67 FPS
medium	67 FPS	58 FPS
high	52 FPS	40 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	35 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open Quadro M6000 24GB

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro M6000 24GB
1080p
low	470 FPS	191 FPS
medium	405 FPS	168 FPS
high	327 FPS	136 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	105 FPS
1440p
low	294 FPS	131 FPS
medium	246 FPS	106 FPS
high	213 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	63 FPS
4K
low	141 FPS	62 FPS
medium	120 FPS	52 FPS
high	105 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	38 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open Quadro M6000 24GB

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro M6000 24GB
1080p
low	885 FPS	523 FPS
medium	712 FPS	418 FPS
high	619 FPS	349 FPS
ultra	499 FPS	262 FPS
1440p
low	692 FPS	392 FPS
medium	557 FPS	314 FPS
high	473 FPS	262 FPS
ultra	374 FPS	196 FPS
4K
low	479 FPS	262 FPS
medium	388 FPS	209 FPS
high	330 FPS	174 FPS
ultra	249 FPS	131 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open Quadro M6000 24GB

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro M6000 24GB
1080p
low	600 FPS	233 FPS
medium	527 FPS	200 FPS
high	433 FPS	166 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	138 FPS
1440p
low	489 FPS	179 FPS
medium	433 FPS	157 FPS
high	339 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	297 FPS	102 FPS
4K
low	292 FPS	102 FPS
medium	270 FPS	82 FPS
high	238 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	200 FPS	52 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open Quadro M6000 24GB

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Quadro M6000 24GB

GeForce RTX 3070

The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Quadro M6000 24GB

The Quadro M6000 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 5 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,625 points. Launch price was $4,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Quadro M6000 24GB's 11,625 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 90.7%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Quadro M6000 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 3,072 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000 24GB). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1114 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro M6000 24GB
G3D Mark Score	22,172+91%	11,625
Architecture	Ampere	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	5888+92%	3072
Compute (TFLOPS)	20.31 TFLOPS+197%	6.844 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1725 MHz+55%	1114 MHz
ROPs	96	96
TMUs	184	256+39%
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+427%	1.1 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+33%	3 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M6000 24GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro M6000 24GB
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M6000 24GB has 24 GB. The Quadro M6000 24GB offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000 24GB) — a 41.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 3 MB (Quadro M6000 24GB) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro M6000 24GB
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	24 GB+200%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	448 GB/s+41%	317 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit	384-bit+50%
L2 Cache	4 MB+33%	3 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12/1 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro M6000 24GB
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12/1
Vulkan	1.4+27%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000 24GB).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro M6000 24GB
Encoder	NVENC 7th gen	NVENC 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Quadro M6000 24GB's 250W — a 12.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 500W (Quadro M6000 24GB). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro M6000 24GB
TDP	220W-12%	250W
Recommended PSU	650W	500W-23%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	267mm
Height	112mm	112mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	100.8+117%	46.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Quadro M6000 24GB launched at $4999. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 90% less ($4500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2.3 (Quadro M6000 24GB) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 1830.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).