
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Quadro M5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅105.6% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $301 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 349.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌46.7% higher power demand at 220W vs 150W.
Quadro M5500
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 220W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌60.3% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.9 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Quadro M5500
2016Why buy it
- ✅105.6% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $301 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 349.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 220W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌46.7% higher power demand at 220W vs 150W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌60.3% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.9 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Quadro M5500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro M5500 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 52 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 89 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 50 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Quadro M5500

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Quadro M5500
Quadro M5500
The Quadro M5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1140 MHz to 1165 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,915 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Quadro M5500's 7,915 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 180.1%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Quadro M5500 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2,048 (Quadro M5500). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 4.772 TFLOPS (Quadro M5500). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1165 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+180% | 7,915 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+188% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+326% | 4.772 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+48% | 1165 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+44% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+673% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M5500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2 MB (Quadro M5500) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M5500). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M5500). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC (Maxwell). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro M5500).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC (Maxwell) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC (Maxwell) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Quadro M5500's 150W — a 37.8% difference. The Quadro M5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (Quadro M5500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 150W-32% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+91% | 52.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Quadro M5500 launched at $800. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 37.6% less ($301 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 9.9 (Quadro M5500) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 348.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-38% | $800 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+348% | 9.9 |
| Codename | GA104 | GM204 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | April 8 2016 |
| Ranking | #63 | #321 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












