
Quadro GV100
Popular choices:

TITAN Xp
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro GV100
2018Why buy it
- ✅32.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than TITAN Xp: it remains the more sensible modern option while TITAN Xp is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌650.5% HIGHER MSRP$8,999 MSRPvs$1,199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 15.6 G3D/$ ($8,999 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
TITAN Xp
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $7,800 less on MSRP ($1,199 MSRP vs $8,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 640.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.6 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $8,999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro GV100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quadro GV100
2018TITAN Xp
2017Why buy it
- ✅32.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than TITAN Xp: it remains the more sensible modern option while TITAN Xp is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $7,800 less on MSRP ($1,199 MSRP vs $8,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 640.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.6 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $8,999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌650.5% HIGHER MSRP$8,999 MSRPvs$1,199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 15.6 G3D/$ ($8,999 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro GV100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro GV100 better than TITAN Xp?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is TITAN Xp still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro GV100 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 41 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro GV100 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 385 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 342 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 257 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 208 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 224 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 141 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro GV100 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 856 FPS | 825 FPS |
| medium | 684 FPS | 668 FPS |
| high | 570 FPS | 563 FPS |
| ultra | 428 FPS | 422 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 642 FPS | 633 FPS |
| medium | 513 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 316 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 342 FPS | 338 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 211 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro GV100 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 519 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 219 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 185 FPS | 299 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 246 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 180 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro GV100 and TITAN Xp

Quadro GV100
Quadro GV100
The Quadro GV100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 27 2018. It features the Volta architecture. The core clock ranges from 1132 MHz to 1627 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,013 points. Launch price was $8,999.

TITAN Xp
TITAN Xp
The TITAN Xp is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1405 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,752 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro GV100 scores 19,013 and the TITAN Xp reaches 18,752 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro GV100 is built on Volta while the TITAN Xp uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 5,120 (Quadro GV100) vs 3,840 (TITAN Xp). Raw compute: 16.66 TFLOPS (Quadro GV100) vs 12.15 TFLOPS (TITAN Xp). Boost clocks: 1627 MHz vs 1582 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro GV100 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,013+1% | 18,752 |
| Architecture | Volta | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 5120+33% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.66 TFLOPS+37% | 12.15 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1627 MHz+3% | 1582 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+33% | 96 |
| TMUs | 320+33% | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 10 MB+614% | 1.4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+100% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro GV100 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro GV100 comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN Xp has 12 GB. The Quadro GV100 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 1024 GB/s (Quadro GV100) vs 547.7 GB/s (TITAN Xp) — a 87% advantage for the Quadro GV100. Bus width: 4096-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro GV100) vs 3 MB (TITAN Xp) — the Quadro GV100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro GV100 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+167% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1024 GB/s+87% | 547.7 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 4096-bit+967% | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+100% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro GV100) vs 12.0 (TITAN Xp). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro GV100 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro GV100) vs NVENC 5.0 (TITAN Xp). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Quadro GV100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (TITAN Xp).
| Feature | Quadro GV100 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | NVENC 5.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th Gen | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro GV100 draws 250W versus the TITAN Xp's 250W — a 0% difference. The TITAN Xp is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro GV100) vs 600W (TITAN Xp). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro GV100 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 600W-8% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 76.1+1% | 75.0 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro GV100 launched at $8999 MSRP, while the TITAN Xp launched at $1199. The TITAN Xp costs 86.7% less ($7800 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.1 (Quadro GV100) vs 15.6 (TITAN Xp) — the TITAN Xp offers 642.9% better value. The Quadro GV100 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro GV100 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $8999 | $1199-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.1 | 15.6+643% |
| Codename | GV100 | GP102 |
| Release | March 27 2018 | April 6 2017 |
| Ranking | #89 | #87 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












