
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Quadro GP100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅26.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $6,501 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2168.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro GP100
2016Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1302.8% HIGHER MSRP$7,000 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($7,000 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Quadro GP100
2016Why buy it
- ✅26.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $6,501 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2168.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1302.8% HIGHER MSRP$7,000 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($7,000 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Quadro GP100?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro GP100 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 61 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 59 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 494 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 308 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 463 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 231 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 154 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 337 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 146 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Quadro GP100

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Quadro GP100
Quadro GP100
The Quadro GP100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1304 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,710 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Quadro GP100's 13,710 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 61.7%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Quadro GP100 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 3,584 (Quadro GP100). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 10.34 TFLOPS (Quadro GP100). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1442 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+62% | 13,710 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+64% | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+96% | 10.34 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+20% | 1442 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 184 | 224+22% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+346% | 1.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro GP100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro GP100 has 16 GB. The Quadro GP100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1024 GB/s (Quadro GP100) — a 128.6% advantage for the Quadro GP100. Bus width: 256-bit vs 4096-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 1024 GB/s+129% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 4096-bit+1500% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 (Quadro GP100). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC 4th gen (Quadro GP100). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 3rd gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Quadro GP100).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 4th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 3rd gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Quadro GP100's 235W — a 6.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 500W (Quadro GP100). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-6% | 235W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+73% | 58.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Quadro GP100 launched at $7000. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 92.9% less ($6501 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2.0 (Quadro GP100) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 2120% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-93% | $7000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+2120% | 2.0 |
| Codename | GA104 | GP100 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #63 | #178 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












