Phenom II X6 1045T
Popular choices:
Xeon W3550
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Phenom II X6 1045T
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 130W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,244 vs 3,251).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W3550, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
Xeon W3550
2009Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $294 MSRP, while Phenom II X6 1045T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌36.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 95W.
Phenom II X6 1045T
2010Xeon W3550
2009Why buy it
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 130W, a 35W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,244 vs 3,251).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W3550, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $294 MSRP, while Phenom II X6 1045T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌36.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 95W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W3550 better than Phenom II X6 1045T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1045T | Xeon W3550 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 34 FPS |
Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1045T | Xeon W3550 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 54 FPS |
League of Legends
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1045T | Xeon W3550 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
Valorant
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1045T | Xeon W3550 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Phenom II X6 1045T and Xeon W3550
Phenom II X6 1045T
Phenom II X6 1045T
The Phenom II X6 1045T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,244 points. Launch price was $175.
Xeon W3550
Xeon W3550
The Xeon W3550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,251 points. Launch price was $235.
Processing Power
The Phenom II X6 1045T packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Xeon W3550 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Phenom II X6 1045T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1045T versus 3.33 GHz on the Xeon W3550 — a 4% clock advantage for the Xeon W3550 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.06 GHz). The Phenom II X6 1045T uses the Thuban (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon W3550 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X6 1045T scores 3,244 against the Xeon W3550's 3,251 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon W3550. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1045T vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon W3550.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1045T | Xeon W3550 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.33 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.06 GHz+13% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Thuban (2010) | Bloomfield (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 3,244 | 3,251 |
Memory & Platform
The Phenom II X6 1045T uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon W3550 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1045T | Xeon W3550 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Phenom II X6 1045T and Xeon W3550
