
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

M2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +84.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while M2 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while M2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β525% higher power demand at 125W vs 20W.
M2
2022Why buy it
- β Draws 20W instead of 125W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (14,933 vs 37,655).
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-13600K
2022M2
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +84.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while M2 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- β Draws 20W instead of 125W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while M2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β525% higher power demand at 125W vs 20W.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (14,933 vs 37,655).
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than M2?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | M2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | M2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 106 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | M2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 363 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 221 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | M2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 328 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and M2

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.
M2
M2
The M2 is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 10 June 2022 (3 years ago). It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.424 GHz, with boost up to 3.48 GHz. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 14,933 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the M2 offers 8 cores / 8 threads β the Core i5-13600K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 3.48 GHz on the M2 β a 37.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.424 GHz). The Core i5-13600K is built on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the M2's 14,933 β a 86.4% lead for the Core i5-13600K.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+47% | 3.48 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+44% | 2.424 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | β |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 20 MB+900% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | β |
| PassMark | 37,655+152% | 14,933 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the M2 uses none (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | none |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | Yes | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) / not specified (M2). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the M2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | β |
| Unlocked | Yes | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | β |
| Target Use | Desktop | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













