
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $191 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 55.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 72.0 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 55W.
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
2025Why buy it
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 125W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (43,174 vs 45,784).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 72.0 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($600 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
Core i7-13700K
2022Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $191 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 55.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 72.0 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 125W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (43,174 vs 45,784).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 72.0 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($600 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Ryzen AI Max PRO 390?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 185 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 97 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 778 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 656 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 517 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 459 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 654 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 572 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 463 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 300 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 264 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 1021 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 783 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 685 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 580 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 818 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 635 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 565 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 342 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 1079 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 912 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 811 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 895 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 788 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 689 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 605 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 658 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.


Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 43,174 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — a 7.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390's 43,174 — a 5.9% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+8% | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+6% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+113% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| PassMark | 45,784+6% | 43,174 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-13700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700K) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 28 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390) — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and Strix Halo (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390).
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP11 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | 8000+159900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+157286300% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700K) and AMD Radeon 8050S (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 rivals Apple M4 Max.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | AMD Radeon 8050S |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 debuted at $600. On MSRP ($409 vs $600), the Core i7-13700K is $191 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 72.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — making the Core i7-13700K the 43.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-32% | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.9+55% | 72.0 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












