
Core i7-12700K
Popular choices:

Core i7-14700T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-12700K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 33 MB).
- ❌6.5% HIGHER MSRP$409 MSRPvs$384 MSRP
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-14700T.
Core i7-14700T
2024Why buy it
- ✅+32% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Costs $25 less on MSRP ($384 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-12700K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (31,604 vs 34,347).
Core i7-12700K
2021Core i7-14700T
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅+32% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Costs $25 less on MSRP ($384 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-12700K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 33 MB).
- ❌6.5% HIGHER MSRP$409 MSRPvs$384 MSRP
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-14700T.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (31,604 vs 34,347).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-12700K better than Core i7-14700T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Core i7-14700T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Core i7-14700T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 630 FPS | 345 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 410 FPS | 225 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 300 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 312 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 133 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Core i7-14700T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 797 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 633 FPS | 528 FPS |
| high | 556 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 472 FPS | 403 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 704 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 368 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 431 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 288 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Core i7-14700T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 790 FPS |
| medium | 802 FPS | 790 FPS |
| high | 699 FPS | 717 FPS |
| ultra | 628 FPS | 644 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 760 FPS | 772 FPS |
| medium | 678 FPS | 688 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 592 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 522 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 494 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 440 FPS |
| ultra | 384 FPS | 384 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12700K and Core i7-14700T

Core i7-12700K
Core i7-12700K
The Core i7-12700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,347 points. Launch price was $409.

Core i7-14700T
Core i7-14700T
The Core i7-14700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 31,604 points. Launch price was $384.
Processing Power
The Core i7-12700K packs 12 cores / 20 threads, while the Core i7-14700T offers 20 cores / 28 threads — the Core i7-14700T has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700K versus 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-14700T — a 3.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-14700T (base: 3.6 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Core i7-12700K uses the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-14700T uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12700K scores 34,347 against the Core i7-14700T's 31,604 — a 8.3% lead for the Core i7-12700K. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700K vs 33 MB (total) on the Core i7-14700T.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Core i7-14700T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 20 | 20 / 28+67% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5.2 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+177% | 1.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB (total) | 33 MB (total)+32% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+60% |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 34,347+9% | 31,604 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,723 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 18,390 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Core i7-12700K versus DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-14700T — the Core i7-12700K supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-14700T supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Z690,B660 (Core i7-12700K) and Z790,B760,H770,Z690,B660,H610 (Core i7-14700T).
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Core i7-14700T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+95900% | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 192 GB+157286300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-12700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-12700K) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-14700T). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-12700K) and UHD 770 (Core i7-14700T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-14700T targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700K rivals Ryzen 7 5800X; Core i7-14700T rivals Ryzen 7 7700.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Core i7-14700T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | UHD 770 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Productivity |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-12700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Core i7-14700T debuted at $384. On MSRP ($409 vs $384), the Core i7-14700T is $25 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-12700K delivers 84.0 pts/$ vs 82.3 pts/$ for the Core i7-14700T — making the Core i7-12700K the 2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Core i7-14700T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409 | $384-6% |
| Performance per Dollar | 84.0+2% | 82.3 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













