
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Xeon W-2245
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.8% higher average FPS across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 17 MB).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 155W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon W-2245 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon W-2245
2019Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,422 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌24% higher power demand at 155W vs 125W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i5-13600K
2022Xeon W-2245
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.8% higher average FPS across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 17 MB).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 155W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon W-2245 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,422 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌24% higher power demand at 155W vs 125W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than Xeon W-2245?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Xeon W-2245 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Xeon W-2245 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 254 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 351 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 300 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Xeon W-2245 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 486 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 486 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Xeon W-2245 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 486 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 486 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Xeon W-2245

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Xeon W-2245
Xeon W-2245
The Xeon W-2245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 19,422 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon W-2245 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 4.7 GHz on the Xeon W-2245 — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i5-13600K is built on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Xeon W-2245's 19,422 — a 63.9% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon W-2245.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Xeon W-2245 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+9% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.9 GHz+11% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB+45% | 16.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | — |
| PassMark | 37,655+94% | 19,422 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-2245 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Xeon W-2245 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) / not specified (Xeon W-2245). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon W-2245 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Xeon W-2245 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













