Core i5-13600K vs Xeon W-2245

Intel

Core i5-13600K

14 Cores20 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon W-2245

8 Cores16 Thrd155 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2019

Popular choices:

i5-13600K

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +17.8% higher average FPS across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +45.5% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 17 MB).
  • Draws 125W instead of 155W, a 30W reduction.
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon W-2245 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon W-2245

2019

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (19,422 vs 37,655).
    • Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 24 MB).
    • 24% higher power demand at 155W vs 125W.
    • Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core i5-13600K better than Xeon W-2245?
    Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-2245 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13600K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13600K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 17.8% more average FPS across 15 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13600K is the better fit. You are getting 93.9% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 45.5% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 17 MB).
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core i5-13600K is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13600K is at an unclear MSRP at $329 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 17.8% average FPS lead across 15 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (114.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core i5-13600K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2066, 45.5% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 17 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 20 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

    Games Benchmarks

    Paired with RTX 4090

    To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

    Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

    Path of Exile 2

    Path of Exile 2

    PresetCore i5-13600KXeon W-2245
    1080p
    low281 FPS184 FPS
    medium264 FPS147 FPS
    high220 FPS122 FPS
    ultra188 FPS100 FPS
    1440p
    low235 FPS151 FPS
    medium198 FPS118 FPS
    high158 FPS97 FPS
    ultra138 FPS80 FPS
    4K
    low159 FPS82 FPS
    medium133 FPS69 FPS
    high102 FPS56 FPS
    ultra90 FPS44 FPS
    Counter-Strike 2

    Counter-Strike 2

    PresetCore i5-13600KXeon W-2245
    1080p
    low632 FPS396 FPS
    medium533 FPS329 FPS
    high450 FPS288 FPS
    ultra416 FPS254 FPS
    1440p
    low540 FPS351 FPS
    medium474 FPS300 FPS
    high403 FPS263 FPS
    ultra351 FPS226 FPS
    4K
    low316 FPS246 FPS
    medium282 FPS214 FPS
    high269 FPS199 FPS
    ultra238 FPS171 FPS
    League of Legends

    League of Legends

    PresetCore i5-13600KXeon W-2245
    1080p
    low663 FPS486 FPS
    medium543 FPS486 FPS
    high477 FPS486 FPS
    ultra414 FPS486 FPS
    1440p
    low600 FPS486 FPS
    medium499 FPS486 FPS
    high434 FPS486 FPS
    ultra376 FPS486 FPS
    4K
    low441 FPS486 FPS
    medium381 FPS486 FPS
    high344 FPS452 FPS
    ultra295 FPS378 FPS
    Valorant

    Valorant

    PresetCore i5-13600KXeon W-2245
    1080p
    low941 FPS486 FPS
    medium941 FPS486 FPS
    high923 FPS486 FPS
    ultra831 FPS486 FPS
    1440p
    low941 FPS486 FPS
    medium850 FPS486 FPS
    high738 FPS486 FPS
    ultra651 FPS486 FPS
    4K
    low651 FPS486 FPS
    medium588 FPS486 FPS
    high529 FPS486 FPS
    ultra437 FPS437 FPS

    Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Xeon W-2245

    Intel

    Core i5-13600K

    The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

    Intel

    Xeon W-2245

    The Xeon W-2245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 19,422 points. Launch price was $800.

    Processing Power

    The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon W-2245 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 4.7 GHz on the Xeon W-2245 — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i5-13600K is built on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Xeon W-2245's 19,422 — a 63.9% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon W-2245.

    FeatureCore i5-13600KXeon W-2245
    Cores / Threads
    14 / 20+75%
    8 / 16
    Boost Clock
    5.1 GHz+9%
    4.7 GHz
    Base Clock
    3.5 GHz
    3.9 GHz+11%
    L3 Cache
    24 MB+45%
    16.5 MB
    L2 Cache
    2 MB (per core)
    Process
    Intel 7 nm-50%
    14 nm
    Architecture
    Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
    PassMark
    37,655+94%
    19,422
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-2245 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore i5-13600KXeon W-2245
    Socket
    LGA1700
    LGA2066
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 5.0+25%
    PCIe 4.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR5-5600
    Max RAM Capacity
    192 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    20
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) / not specified (Xeon W-2245). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon W-2245 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.

    FeatureCore i5-13600KXeon W-2245
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    UHD Graphics 770
    Unlocked
    Yes
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d
    Target Use
    Desktop