PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.2% higher average FPS across 14 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Costs $165 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $494 MSRP).
✅Delivers 136.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 48.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $494 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌56.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 80W.

Xeon W-1390

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 80W instead of 125W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 14 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (23,902 vs 37,655).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 48.4 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($494 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Xeon W-1390

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.2% higher average FPS across 14 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Costs $165 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $494 MSRP).
✅Delivers 136.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 48.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $494 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅Draws 80W instead of 125W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌56.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 80W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 14 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (23,902 vs 37,655).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 48.4 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($494 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13600K better than Xeon W-1390?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-1390 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13600K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13600K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 25.2% more average FPS across 14 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13600K is the better fit. You are getting 57.5% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13600K is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13600K is $165 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $494 MSRP, and it gives you a 25.2% average FPS lead across 14 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 136.5% better value on MSRP (114.5 vs 48.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13600K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 20 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13600K Benchmark Check

Xeon W-1390 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Xeon W-1390
1080p
low	281 FPS	246 FPS
medium	264 FPS	231 FPS
high	220 FPS	192 FPS
ultra	188 FPS	165 FPS
1440p
low	235 FPS	217 FPS
medium	198 FPS	184 FPS
high	158 FPS	148 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	130 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	151 FPS
medium	133 FPS	128 FPS
high	102 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	86 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Xeon W-1390

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Xeon W-1390
1080p
low	632 FPS	406 FPS
medium	533 FPS	343 FPS
high	450 FPS	306 FPS
ultra	416 FPS	274 FPS
1440p
low	540 FPS	363 FPS
medium	474 FPS	315 FPS
high	403 FPS	278 FPS
ultra	351 FPS	239 FPS
4K
low	316 FPS	241 FPS
medium	282 FPS	216 FPS
high	269 FPS	208 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	176 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Xeon W-1390

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Xeon W-1390
1080p
low	663 FPS	598 FPS
medium	543 FPS	527 FPS
high	477 FPS	453 FPS
ultra	414 FPS	391 FPS
1440p
low	600 FPS	590 FPS
medium	499 FPS	490 FPS
high	434 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	376 FPS	361 FPS
4K
low	441 FPS	421 FPS
medium	381 FPS	365 FPS
high	344 FPS	325 FPS
ultra	295 FPS	276 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Xeon W-1390

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Xeon W-1390
1080p
low	941 FPS	598 FPS
medium	941 FPS	598 FPS
high	923 FPS	598 FPS
ultra	831 FPS	598 FPS
1440p
low	941 FPS	598 FPS
medium	850 FPS	598 FPS
high	738 FPS	598 FPS
ultra	651 FPS	552 FPS
4K
low	651 FPS	558 FPS
medium	588 FPS	506 FPS
high	529 FPS	452 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	393 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Xeon W-1390

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Xeon W-1390

Core i5-13600K

The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Xeon W-1390

The Xeon W-1390 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 23,902 points. Launch price was $494.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon W-1390 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1390 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-1390 uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Xeon W-1390's 23,902 — a 44.7% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1390.

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Xeon W-1390
Cores / Threads	14 / 20+75%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz	5.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+25%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB+50%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Rocket Lake-S (2021)
PassMark	37,655+58%	23,902

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-1390 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Xeon W-1390
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) / not specified (Xeon W-1390). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon W-1390 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Xeon W-1390
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon W-1390 debuted at $494. On MSRP ($329 vs $494), the Core i5-13600K is $165 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600K delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 48.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1390 — making the Core i5-13600K the 81.1% better value option.