PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.4% higher average FPS across 22 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $4,666 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
✅Delivers 617.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 15.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 270W, a 145W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon 6737P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (37,655 vs 79,634).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 144 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6737P, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.

Xeon 6737P

2025

Why buy it

✅+111.5% higher PassMark.
✅+500% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅340% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 22 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($4,995 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌116% higher power demand at 270W vs 125W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Xeon 6737P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.4% higher average FPS across 22 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $4,666 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
✅Delivers 617.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 15.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 270W, a 145W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon 6737P needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+111.5% higher PassMark.
✅+500% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅340% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (37,655 vs 79,634).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 144 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6737P, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 22 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($4,995 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌116% higher power demand at 270W vs 125W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13600K better than Xeon 6737P?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon 6737P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13600K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6737P is the better fit. You are getting 111.5% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 500% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13600K is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13600K is $4,666 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $4,995 MSRP, and it gives you a 15.4% average FPS lead across 22 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon 6737P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 111.5% better PassMark. It is also 617.9% better value on MSRP (114.5 vs 15.9 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6737P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022), 500% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 24 MB), more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 14/20, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13600K Benchmark Check

Xeon 6737P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Xeon 6737P
1080p
low	281 FPS	190 FPS
medium	264 FPS	166 FPS
high	220 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	188 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	235 FPS	156 FPS
medium	198 FPS	132 FPS
high	158 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	83 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	71 FPS
medium	133 FPS	63 FPS
high	102 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	40 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Xeon 6737P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Xeon 6737P
1080p
low	632 FPS	520 FPS
medium	533 FPS	460 FPS
high	450 FPS	376 FPS
ultra	416 FPS	309 FPS
1440p
low	540 FPS	425 FPS
medium	474 FPS	383 FPS
high	403 FPS	321 FPS
ultra	351 FPS	256 FPS
4K
low	316 FPS	262 FPS
medium	282 FPS	239 FPS
high	269 FPS	212 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	176 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Xeon 6737P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Xeon 6737P
1080p
low	663 FPS	883 FPS
medium	543 FPS	813 FPS
high	477 FPS	768 FPS
ultra	414 FPS	677 FPS
1440p
low	600 FPS	756 FPS
medium	499 FPS	692 FPS
high	434 FPS	650 FPS
ultra	376 FPS	581 FPS
4K
low	441 FPS	510 FPS
medium	381 FPS	429 FPS
high	344 FPS	383 FPS
ultra	295 FPS	318 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Xeon 6737P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Xeon 6737P
1080p
low	941 FPS	985 FPS
medium	941 FPS	886 FPS
high	923 FPS	766 FPS
ultra	831 FPS	665 FPS
1440p
low	941 FPS	806 FPS
medium	850 FPS	701 FPS
high	738 FPS	604 FPS
ultra	651 FPS	519 FPS
4K
low	651 FPS	582 FPS
medium	588 FPS	521 FPS
high	529 FPS	462 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	397 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Xeon 6737P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Xeon 6737P

Core i5-13600K

The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Xeon 6737P

The Xeon 6737P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 79,634 points. Launch price was $4,995.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon 6737P offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon 6737P has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 4 GHz on the Xeon 6737P — a 24.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon 6737P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Xeon 6737P's 79,634 — a 71.6% lead for the Xeon 6737P. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6737P.

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Xeon 6737P
Cores / Threads	14 / 20	32 / 64+129%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+27%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+21%	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB	144 MB (total)+500%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	37,655	79,634+111%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,000
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	45,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6737P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Xeon 6737P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13600K) vs 8 (Xeon 6737P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13600K) vs 88 (Xeon 6737P) — the Xeon 6737P offers 68 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and C741 (Xeon 6737P).

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Xeon 6737P
Socket	LGA1700	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	88+340%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i5-13600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon 6737P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon 6737P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop, Xeon 6737P targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6737P rivals EPYC 9005.

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Xeon 6737P
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 770	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Desktop	High Performance Server

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon 6737P debuted at $4995. On MSRP ($329 vs $4995), the Core i5-13600K is $4666 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600K delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 15.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6737P — making the Core i5-13600K the 151.1% better value option.