PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +39.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $470 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 314.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 27.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 140W, a 15W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

2017

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,066 vs 37,655).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.6 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +39.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $470 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 314.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 27.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 140W, a 15W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,066 vs 37,655).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.6 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13600K better than Ryzen Threadripper 1920?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper 1920 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13600K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13600K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 39.3% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13600K is the better fit. You are getting 70.6% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13600K is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13600K is $470 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $799 MSRP, and it gives you a 39.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 314.4% better value on MSRP (114.5 vs 27.6 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13600K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of SP3r2, and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 20 threads instead of 12/24. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13600K Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
1080p
low	281 FPS	175 FPS
medium	264 FPS	156 FPS
high	220 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	188 FPS	105 FPS
1440p
low	235 FPS	143 FPS
medium	198 FPS	121 FPS
high	158 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	65 FPS
medium	133 FPS	59 FPS
high	102 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	37 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
1080p
low	632 FPS	398 FPS
medium	533 FPS	357 FPS
high	450 FPS	304 FPS
ultra	416 FPS	252 FPS
1440p
low	540 FPS	339 FPS
medium	474 FPS	309 FPS
high	403 FPS	265 FPS
ultra	351 FPS	219 FPS
4K
low	316 FPS	217 FPS
medium	282 FPS	197 FPS
high	269 FPS	179 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	145 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
1080p
low	663 FPS	552 FPS
medium	543 FPS	539 FPS
high	477 FPS	501 FPS
ultra	414 FPS	442 FPS
1440p
low	600 FPS	552 FPS
medium	499 FPS	464 FPS
high	434 FPS	418 FPS
ultra	376 FPS	367 FPS
4K
low	441 FPS	420 FPS
medium	381 FPS	334 FPS
high	344 FPS	303 FPS
ultra	295 FPS	252 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
1080p
low	941 FPS	552 FPS
medium	941 FPS	552 FPS
high	923 FPS	552 FPS
ultra	831 FPS	528 FPS
1440p
low	941 FPS	552 FPS
medium	850 FPS	552 FPS
high	738 FPS	493 FPS
ultra	651 FPS	423 FPS
4K
low	651 FPS	444 FPS
medium	588 FPS	408 FPS
high	529 FPS	367 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	318 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Core i5-13600K

The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,066 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 — a 29.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1920's 22,066 — a 52.2% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920.

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Cores / Threads	14 / 20+17%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+34%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+9%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB	32 MB+33%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	37,655+71%	22,066

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Socket	LGA1700	SP3r2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) / not specified (Ryzen Threadripper 1920). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 debuted at $799. On MSRP ($329 vs $799), the Core i5-13600K is $470 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600K delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 27.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 — making the Core i5-13600K the 122.2% better value option.