
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI Max 385
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max 385 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 55W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen AI Max 385.
Ryzen AI Max 385
2025Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 125W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Core i5-13600K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (32,274 vs 37,655).
Core i5-13600K
2022Ryzen AI Max 385
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 125W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Core i5-13600K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max 385 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 55W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen AI Max 385.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (32,274 vs 37,655).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than Ryzen AI Max 385?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen AI Max 385 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen AI Max 385 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 592 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 500 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 346 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 359 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 273 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 209 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen AI Max 385 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 780 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 611 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 534 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 447 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 676 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 534 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 463 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 389 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 476 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 288 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen AI Max 385 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 807 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 807 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 779 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 700 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 796 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 706 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 619 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 536 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 554 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 499 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 389 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Ryzen AI Max 385

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.


Ryzen AI Max 385
Ryzen AI Max 385
The Ryzen AI Max 385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,274 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max 385 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max 385 — a 2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max 385 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Ryzen AI Max 385's 32,274 — a 15.4% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max 385.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen AI Max 385 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+2% | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 32 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| PassMark | 37,655+17% | 32,274 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,800 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 14,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max 385 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13600K) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max 385). Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and Strix Halo platform (Ryzen AI Max 385).
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen AI Max 385 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP11 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | LPDDR5x-8000 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen AI Max 385 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) vs AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max 385). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) and Radeon 8050S (Ryzen AI Max 385) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop, Ryzen AI Max 385 targets High-performance AI / Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max 385 rivals Core Ultra 9 285H.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen AI Max 385 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon 8050S |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | High-performance AI / Gaming Laptop |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI Max 385 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($329 vs $0), the Ryzen AI Max 385 is $329 cheaper.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen AI Max 385 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 114.5 | — |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












