
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅+8.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $71 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 31.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 87.1 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 7745.
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
2023Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-13600K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,827 vs 37,655).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 87.1 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Core i5-13600K
2022Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
2023Why buy it
- ✅+8.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $71 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 31.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 87.1 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-13600K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 7745.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,827 vs 37,655).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 87.1 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 better than Core i5-13600K?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 616 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 516 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 461 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 387 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 331 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 228 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 871 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 871 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 871 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 871 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 871 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 870 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 788 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 581 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 499 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 449 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 379 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 871 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 871 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 871 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 847 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 871 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 871 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 765 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 646 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 680 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 599 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 530 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.


Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
The Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,827 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 — a 3.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745's 34,827 — a 7.8% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.3 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 32 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 37,655+8% | 34,827 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i5-13600K versus 5200 on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 — the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13600K) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745) — the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and AM5 (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745).
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | 5200+103900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+157286300% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-13600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) vs AMD-V, IOMMU (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) and AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 rivals Core i7-13700.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | AMD Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V, IOMMU |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 debuted at $400. On MSRP ($329 vs $400), the Core i5-13600K is $71 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600K delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 87.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 — making the Core i5-13600K the 27.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-18% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 114.5+31% | 87.1 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












