
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7735H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7735H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
Ryzen 7 7735H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,619 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Core i5-13600K
2022Ryzen 7 7735H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7735H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,619 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than Ryzen 7 7735H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 7735H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 7735H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 272 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 238 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 179 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 7735H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 387 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 505 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 321 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 261 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 7735H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 590 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 590 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 590 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 590 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 587 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 510 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 376 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Ryzen 7 7735H

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.


Ryzen 7 7735H
Ryzen 7 7735H
The Ryzen 7 7735H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.75 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 23,619 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7735H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 4.75 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7735H — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7735H uses Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Ryzen 7 7735H's 23,619 — a 45.8% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7735H.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 7735H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+7% | 4.75 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+9% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB+50% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 6 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) |
| PassMark | 37,655+59% | 23,619 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7735H uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 7735H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+200% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-13600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7735H). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) and Radeon 680M (Ryzen 7 7735H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop, Ryzen 7 7735H targets Mobile.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 7735H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon 680M |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












