
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌346.4% higher power demand at 125W vs 28W.
Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 125W, a 97W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,373 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-13600K
2022Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 125W, a 97W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌346.4% higher power demand at 125W vs 28W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,373 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 374 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 237 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 164 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 559 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 559 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 559 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 559 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 511 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 437 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 415 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 355 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 293 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 559 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 559 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 559 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 559 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 559 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 559 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 531 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 473 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 411 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.


Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U
Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U
The Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,373 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U — a 4% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U's 22,373 — a 50.9% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+133% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+4% | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB+50% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 37,655+68% | 22,373 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












