Core i5-13600K vs Ryzen 5 7640HS

Intel

Core i5-13600K

14 Cores20 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 7640HS

6 Cores12 Thrd35 WWMax: 5 GHz2023

Popular choices:

i5-13600K

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Why buy it

  • +50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 7640HS needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.

Ryzen 5 7640HS

2023

Why buy it

  • Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (22,921 vs 37,655).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13600K better than Ryzen 5 7640HS?
Yes. Core i5-13600K is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 64.3% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13600K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 1.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13600K is the better fit. You are getting 64.3% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-13600K is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13600K is at an unclear MSRP at $329 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (114.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 7640HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-13600KRyzen 5 7640HS
1080p
low281 FPS267 FPS
medium264 FPS241 FPS
high220 FPS202 FPS
ultra188 FPS174 FPS
1440p
low235 FPS235 FPS
medium198 FPS193 FPS
high158 FPS157 FPS
ultra138 FPS139 FPS
4K
low159 FPS163 FPS
medium133 FPS136 FPS
high102 FPS105 FPS
ultra90 FPS92 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-13600KRyzen 5 7640HS
1080p
low632 FPS433 FPS
medium533 FPS359 FPS
high450 FPS313 FPS
ultra416 FPS276 FPS
1440p
low540 FPS376 FPS
medium474 FPS326 FPS
high403 FPS286 FPS
ultra351 FPS244 FPS
4K
low316 FPS270 FPS
medium282 FPS239 FPS
high269 FPS222 FPS
ultra238 FPS186 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-13600KRyzen 5 7640HS
1080p
low663 FPS573 FPS
medium543 FPS573 FPS
high477 FPS573 FPS
ultra414 FPS573 FPS
1440p
low600 FPS573 FPS
medium499 FPS573 FPS
high434 FPS521 FPS
ultra376 FPS450 FPS
4K
low441 FPS505 FPS
medium381 FPS446 FPS
high344 FPS381 FPS
ultra295 FPS316 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-13600KRyzen 5 7640HS
1080p
low941 FPS573 FPS
medium941 FPS573 FPS
high923 FPS573 FPS
ultra831 FPS573 FPS
1440p
low941 FPS573 FPS
medium850 FPS573 FPS
high738 FPS573 FPS
ultra651 FPS546 FPS
4K
low651 FPS566 FPS
medium588 FPS507 FPS
high529 FPS451 FPS
ultra437 FPS387 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Ryzen 5 7640HS

Intel

Core i5-13600K

The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

AMD

Ryzen 5 7640HS

The Ryzen 5 7640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,921 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7640HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7640HS — a 2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7640HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Ryzen 5 7640HS's 22,921 — a 48.6% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7640HS.

FeatureCore i5-13600KRyzen 5 7640HS
Cores / Threads
14 / 20+133%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+2%
5 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz
4.3 GHz+23%
L3 Cache
24 MB+50%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
PassMark
37,655+64%
22,921
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 7640HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-13600KRyzen 5 7640HS
Socket
LGA1700
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) / not specified (Ryzen 5 7640HS). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 5 7640HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i5-13600KRyzen 5 7640HS
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop