
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7640HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 7640HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
Ryzen 5 7640HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,921 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-13600K
2022Ryzen 5 7640HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 7640HS needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,921 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than Ryzen 5 7640HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 313 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 376 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 244 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 573 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 573 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 521 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 450 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 316 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 573 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 573 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 566 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 387 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Ryzen 5 7640HS

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.


Ryzen 5 7640HS
Ryzen 5 7640HS
The Ryzen 5 7640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,921 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7640HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7640HS — a 2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7640HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Ryzen 5 7640HS's 22,921 — a 48.6% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7640HS.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+133% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+2% | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 4.3 GHz+23% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB+50% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 37,655+64% | 22,921 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 7640HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) / not specified (Ryzen 5 7640HS). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 5 7640HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












