
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

M2 Pro
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +32.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while M2 Pro mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β247.2% higher power demand at 125W vs 36W.
M2 Pro
2023Why buy it
- β Draws 36W instead of 125W, a 89W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (21,939 vs 37,655).
Core i5-13600K
2022M2 Pro
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +32.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- β Draws 36W instead of 125W, a 89W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while M2 Pro mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β247.2% higher power demand at 125W vs 36W.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (21,939 vs 37,655).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than M2 Pro?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | M2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | M2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 327 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 269 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 324 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 289 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 208 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 128 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | M2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 548 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 548 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 548 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 545 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 548 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 478 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 439 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 289 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 231 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | M2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 548 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 548 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 548 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 548 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 548 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 548 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 525 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 451 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 476 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 426 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 332 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and M2 Pro

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.
M2 Pro
M2 Pro
The M2 Pro is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 17 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.42 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 36 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 36 MBΒ +Β 24 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,939 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the M2 Pro offers 12 cores / 12 threads β the Core i5-13600K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 3.5 GHz on the M2 Pro β a 37.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.42 GHz). The Core i5-13600K is built on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the M2 Pro's 21,939 β a 52.7% lead for the Core i5-13600K. Both processors carry 24 MB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | M2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+17% | 12 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+46% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+45% | 2.42 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 24 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 36 MB+1700% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | β |
| PassMark | 37,655+72% | 21,939 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 2,650 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 14,450 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the M2 Pro uses none (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB β 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13600K) vs 0 (M2 Pro) β the Core i5-13600K offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and Apple Silicon (M2 Pro).
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | M2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | none |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | LPDDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+500% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-13600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) vs ARM Virtualization (M2 Pro). Both include integrated graphics β UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) and Apple M2 Pro GPU (M2 Pro) β useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop, M2 Pro targets Professional Laptop.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | M2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Apple M2 Pro GPU |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | ARM Virtualization |
| Target Use | Desktop | Professional Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













