
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

M1 Pro
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +44.2% higher average FPS across 16 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while M1 Pro needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while M1 Pro mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β346.4% higher power demand at 125W vs 28W.
M1 Pro
2021Why buy it
- β Draws 28W instead of 125W, a 97W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 16 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (17,218 vs 37,655).
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-13600K
2022M1 Pro
2021Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +44.2% higher average FPS across 16 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while M1 Pro needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- β Draws 28W instead of 125W, a 97W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while M1 Pro mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β346.4% higher power demand at 125W vs 28W.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 16 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (17,218 vs 37,655).
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than M1 Pro?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | M1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | M1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 77 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | M1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 430 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 430 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 430 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 359 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 217 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | M1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 430 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 430 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 430 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 430 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 429 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 315 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and M1 Pro

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.
M1 Pro
M1 Pro
The M1 Pro is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 18 October 2021 (4 years ago). It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.064 GHz, with boost up to 3.22 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 MBΒ +Β 24 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,218 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the M1 Pro offers 10 cores / 10 threads β the Core i5-13600K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 3.22 GHz on the M1 Pro β a 45.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.064 GHz). The Core i5-13600K is built on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the M1 Pro's 17,218 β a 74.5% lead for the Core i5-13600K. Both processors carry 24 MB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | M1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+40% | 10 / 10 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+58% | 3.22 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+70% | 2.064 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 24 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 28 MB+1300% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | β |
| PassMark | 37,655+119% | 17,218 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the M1 Pro uses none (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | M1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | none |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | Yes | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) / not specified (M1 Pro). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the M1 Pro requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | M1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | β |
| Unlocked | Yes | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | β |
| Target Use | Desktop | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













