Core i5-13600K vs EPYC 72F3

Intel

Core i5-13600K

14 Cores20 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

EPYC 72F3

8 Cores16 Thrd180 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2021

Popular choices:

i5-13600K

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Why buy it

  • +38.2% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 125W instead of 180W, a 55W reduction.
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while EPYC 72F3 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (24 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while EPYC 72F3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

EPYC 72F3

2021

Why buy it

  • Massive L3 cache advantage with 256 MB vs 24 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (27,252 vs 37,655).
  • 44% higher power demand at 180W vs 125W.
  • Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13600K better than EPYC 72F3?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 72F3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13600K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13600K is the better fit. You are getting 38.2% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-13600K is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13600K is at an unclear MSRP at $329 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 38.2% better PassMark. The trade-off is that EPYC 72F3 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (114.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13600K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 20 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-13600KEPYC 72F3
1080p
low281 FPS231 FPS
medium264 FPS184 FPS
high220 FPS149 FPS
ultra188 FPS107 FPS
1440p
low235 FPS196 FPS
medium198 FPS151 FPS
high158 FPS117 FPS
ultra138 FPS86 FPS
4K
low159 FPS77 FPS
medium133 FPS63 FPS
high102 FPS49 FPS
ultra90 FPS40 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-13600KEPYC 72F3
1080p
low632 FPS583 FPS
medium533 FPS510 FPS
high450 FPS412 FPS
ultra416 FPS360 FPS
1440p
low540 FPS489 FPS
medium474 FPS436 FPS
high403 FPS362 FPS
ultra351 FPS300 FPS
4K
low316 FPS304 FPS
medium282 FPS274 FPS
high269 FPS245 FPS
ultra238 FPS220 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-13600KEPYC 72F3
1080p
low663 FPS681 FPS
medium543 FPS681 FPS
high477 FPS681 FPS
ultra414 FPS681 FPS
1440p
low600 FPS681 FPS
medium499 FPS597 FPS
high434 FPS534 FPS
ultra376 FPS466 FPS
4K
low441 FPS485 FPS
medium381 FPS387 FPS
high344 FPS343 FPS
ultra295 FPS277 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-13600KEPYC 72F3
1080p
low941 FPS681 FPS
medium941 FPS681 FPS
high923 FPS681 FPS
ultra831 FPS681 FPS
1440p
low941 FPS681 FPS
medium850 FPS681 FPS
high738 FPS655 FPS
ultra651 FPS565 FPS
4K
low651 FPS643 FPS
medium588 FPS574 FPS
high529 FPS499 FPS
ultra437 FPS427 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and EPYC 72F3

Intel

Core i5-13600K

The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

AMD

EPYC 72F3

The EPYC 72F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,252 points. Launch price was $2,468.

Processing Power

The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the EPYC 72F3 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 72F3 — a 21.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 72F3 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the EPYC 72F3's 27,252 — a 32.1% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 72F3.

FeatureCore i5-13600KEPYC 72F3
Cores / Threads
14 / 20+75%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+24%
4.1 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz
3.7 GHz+6%
L3 Cache
24 MB
256 MB (total)+967%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+300%
512 kB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
7 nm+
Architecture
Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Milan (2021−2023)
PassMark
37,655+38%
27,252
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 72F3 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-13600KEPYC 72F3
Socket
LGA1700
SP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) / not specified (EPYC 72F3). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 72F3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i5-13600KEPYC 72F3
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop