
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

EPYC 7203P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +44.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while EPYC 7203P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while EPYC 7203P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
EPYC 7203P
2023Why buy it
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,017 vs 37,655).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-13600K
2022EPYC 7203P
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +44.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while EPYC 7203P needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while EPYC 7203P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,017 vs 37,655).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than EPYC 7203P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | EPYC 7203P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | EPYC 7203P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 287 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 229 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 332 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 300 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 254 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 129 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | EPYC 7203P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 550 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 468 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 411 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 355 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 310 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 361 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 282 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 241 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 195 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | EPYC 7203P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 550 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 550 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 550 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 550 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 521 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 447 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 445 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 338 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and EPYC 7203P

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

EPYC 7203P
EPYC 7203P
The EPYC 7203P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 22,017 points. Launch price was $348.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the EPYC 7203P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7203P — a 40% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7203P uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the EPYC 7203P's 22,017 — a 52.4% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7203P.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | EPYC 7203P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+50% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+25% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 64 MB (total)+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 37,655+71% | 22,017 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7203P uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | EPYC 7203P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) / not specified (EPYC 7203P). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 7203P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | EPYC 7203P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













