Core i5-13600K vs Core Ultra 9 285H

Intel

Core i5-13600K

14 Cores20 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core Ultra 9 285H

16 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025

Popular choices:

i5-13600K

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Why buy it

  • +9.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Core Ultra 9 285H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.

Core Ultra 9 285H

2025

Why buy it

  • Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
  • 40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (34,327 vs 37,655).

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 9 285H better than Core i5-13600K?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core Ultra 9 285H is ahead with a 1.6% average FPS lead across 11 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13600K pulls ahead with 9.7% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13600K is the better fit. You are getting 9.7% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core Ultra 9 285H is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13600K makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core Ultra 9 285H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 11 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Core i5-13600K is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 9.7% better PassMark. Core i5-13600K is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (114.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 9 285H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-13600KCore Ultra 9 285H
1080p
low281 FPS300 FPS
medium264 FPS274 FPS
high220 FPS229 FPS
ultra188 FPS195 FPS
1440p
low235 FPS244 FPS
medium198 FPS199 FPS
high158 FPS161 FPS
ultra138 FPS140 FPS
4K
low159 FPS169 FPS
medium133 FPS138 FPS
high102 FPS106 FPS
ultra90 FPS93 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-13600KCore Ultra 9 285H
1080p
low632 FPS749 FPS
medium533 FPS602 FPS
high450 FPS496 FPS
ultra416 FPS440 FPS
1440p
low540 FPS650 FPS
medium474 FPS544 FPS
high403 FPS449 FPS
ultra351 FPS376 FPS
4K
low316 FPS383 FPS
medium282 FPS328 FPS
high269 FPS303 FPS
ultra238 FPS260 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-13600KCore Ultra 9 285H
1080p
low663 FPS858 FPS
medium543 FPS826 FPS
high477 FPS717 FPS
ultra414 FPS611 FPS
1440p
low600 FPS858 FPS
medium499 FPS684 FPS
high434 FPS591 FPS
ultra376 FPS506 FPS
4K
low441 FPS599 FPS
medium381 FPS497 FPS
high344 FPS449 FPS
ultra295 FPS380 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-13600KCore Ultra 9 285H
1080p
low941 FPS858 FPS
medium941 FPS858 FPS
high923 FPS839 FPS
ultra831 FPS742 FPS
1440p
low941 FPS858 FPS
medium850 FPS780 FPS
high738 FPS680 FPS
ultra651 FPS587 FPS
4K
low651 FPS594 FPS
medium588 FPS529 FPS
high529 FPS477 FPS
ultra437 FPS416 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Core Ultra 9 285H

Intel

Core i5-13600K

The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Intel

Core Ultra 9 285H

The Core Ultra 9 285H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 34,327 points. Launch price was $651.

Processing Power

The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Core Ultra 9 285H offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 9 285H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 5.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285H — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285H (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 9 285H uses Arrow Lake-H (2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Core Ultra 9 285H's 34,327 — a 9.2% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 285H.

FeatureCore i5-13600KCore Ultra 9 285H
Cores / Threads
14 / 20
16 / 16+14%
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz
5.4 GHz+6%
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+21%
2.9 GHz
L3 Cache
24 MB
24 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
3 MB (per core)+50%
Process
Intel 7 nm
3 nm-57%
Architecture
Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Arrow Lake-H (2025)
PassMark
37,655+10%
34,327
Cinebench R23 Multi
26,500
Geekbench 6 Single
2,720
Geekbench 6 Multi
15,330
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 9 285H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13600K) vs 28 (Core Ultra 9 285H) — the Core Ultra 9 285H offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and SoC (Core Ultra 9 285H).

FeatureCore i5-13600KCore Ultra 9 285H
Socket
LGA1700
FCBGA2049
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
LPDDR5x-8400, DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
28+40%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i5-13600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 9 285H). Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) and Intel Arc 140T (8 Xe-cores) (Core Ultra 9 285H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop, Core Ultra 9 285H targets High-end Mobile Workstation. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 9 285H rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 375.

FeatureCore i5-13600KCore Ultra 9 285H
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 770
Intel Arc 140T (8 Xe-cores)
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Desktop
High-end Mobile Workstation