PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +42.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Costs $191 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $520 MSRP).
✅Delivers 208.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 37.1 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $520 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌635.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 17W.

Core Ultra 7 266V

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 17W instead of 125W, a 108W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,274 vs 37,655).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.1 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($520 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Core Ultra 7 266V

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +42.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Costs $191 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $520 MSRP).
✅Delivers 208.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 37.1 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $520 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Draws 17W instead of 125W, a 108W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌635.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 17W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,274 vs 37,655).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.1 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($520 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13600K better than Core Ultra 7 266V?

Yes. Core i5-13600K is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 42.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data and 95.4% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13600K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 42.8% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13600K is the better fit. You are getting 95.4% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13600K is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13600K is $191 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $520 MSRP, and it gives you a 42.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 208.8% better value on MSRP (114.5 vs 37.1 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 7 266V is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13600K Benchmark Check

Core Ultra 7 266V Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Core Ultra 7 266V
1080p
low	281 FPS	272 FPS
medium	264 FPS	243 FPS
high	220 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	188 FPS	176 FPS
1440p
low	235 FPS	230 FPS
medium	198 FPS	185 FPS
high	158 FPS	152 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	134 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	161 FPS
medium	133 FPS	130 FPS
high	102 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	89 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Core Ultra 7 266V

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Core Ultra 7 266V
1080p
low	632 FPS	236 FPS
medium	533 FPS	195 FPS
high	450 FPS	176 FPS
ultra	416 FPS	155 FPS
1440p
low	540 FPS	210 FPS
medium	474 FPS	181 FPS
high	403 FPS	164 FPS
ultra	351 FPS	139 FPS
4K
low	316 FPS	155 FPS
medium	282 FPS	138 FPS
high	269 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	114 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Core Ultra 7 266V

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Core Ultra 7 266V
1080p
low	663 FPS	482 FPS
medium	543 FPS	482 FPS
high	477 FPS	482 FPS
ultra	414 FPS	482 FPS
1440p
low	600 FPS	482 FPS
medium	499 FPS	482 FPS
high	434 FPS	482 FPS
ultra	376 FPS	468 FPS
4K
low	441 FPS	482 FPS
medium	381 FPS	462 FPS
high	344 FPS	404 FPS
ultra	295 FPS	336 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Core Ultra 7 266V

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Core Ultra 7 266V
1080p
low	941 FPS	482 FPS
medium	941 FPS	482 FPS
high	923 FPS	482 FPS
ultra	831 FPS	482 FPS
1440p
low	941 FPS	482 FPS
medium	850 FPS	482 FPS
high	738 FPS	482 FPS
ultra	651 FPS	482 FPS
4K
low	651 FPS	482 FPS
medium	588 FPS	482 FPS
high	529 FPS	480 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	418 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Core Ultra 7 266V

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Core Ultra 7 266V

Core i5-13600K

The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Core Ultra 7 266V

The Core Ultra 7 266V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,274 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 266V offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 266V — a 2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 266V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Core Ultra 7 266V's 19,274 — a 64.6% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 266V.

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Core Ultra 7 266V
Cores / Threads	14 / 20+75%	8 / 8
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+2%	5 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+59%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB+100%	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2.5 MB (per core)+25%
Process	Intel 7 nm	3 nm-57%
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Lunar Lake (2024)
PassMark	37,655+95%	19,274

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 7 266V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Core Ultra 7 266V
Socket	LGA1700	FCBGA2833
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) / not specified (Core Ultra 7 266V). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Core Ultra 7 266V requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Core Ultra 7 266V
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 7 266V debuted at $520. On MSRP ($329 vs $520), the Core i5-13600K is $191 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600K delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 37.1 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 7 266V — making the Core i5-13600K the 102.1% better value option.