
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 5 245
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (37,655 vs 40,165).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 114.5 vs 125.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $319 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Core Ultra 5 245
2025Why buy it
- ✅+6.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($319 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 10.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 125.9 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($319 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i5-13600K
2022Core Ultra 5 245
2025Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅+6.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($319 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 10.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 125.9 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($319 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (37,655 vs 40,165).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 114.5 vs 125.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $319 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 245 better than Core i5-13600K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 5 245 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 263 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 194 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 5 245 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 668 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 429 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 509 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 426 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 369 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 291 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 256 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 5 245 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 845 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 689 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 613 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 525 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 730 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 519 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 441 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 324 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 5 245 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 1004 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 956 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 834 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 758 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 865 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 764 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 663 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 589 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 585 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 472 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 417 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Core Ultra 5 245

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Core Ultra 5 245
Core Ultra 5 245
The Core Ultra 5 245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 40,165 points. Launch price was $270.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, matching the Core Ultra 5 245's 14 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 245 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 245 uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Core Ultra 5 245's 40,165 — a 6.5% lead for the Core Ultra 5 245. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 245.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 5 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 14 / 14 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+50% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 37,655 | 40,165+7% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 245 uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i5-13600K versus 6400 on the Core Ultra 5 245 — the Core Ultra 5 245 supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 5 245 supports up to 256 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 245).
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 5 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | 6400+127900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+78643100% | 256 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-13600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) and Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics (Core Ultra 5 245) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 245 rivals Ryzen 5 9600X.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 5 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 5 245 debuted at $319. On MSRP ($329 vs $319), the Core Ultra 5 245 is $10 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600K delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 125.9 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 245 — making the Core Ultra 5 245 the 9.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 5 245 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $319-3% |
| Performance per Dollar | 114.5 | 125.9+10% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













