
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Core i9-13980HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $339 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 66.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 68.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13980HX across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (37,655 vs 45,950).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 55W.
Core i9-13980HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 125W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.8 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($668 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Core i5-13600K
2022Core i9-13980HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $339 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 66.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 68.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 125W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13980HX across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (37,655 vs 45,950).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.8 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($668 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13980HX better than Core i5-13600K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i9-13980HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 311 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 209 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 112 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i9-13980HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 313 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 316 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 257 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 179 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i9-13980HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 762 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 626 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 543 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 467 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 680 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 423 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 430 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 329 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i9-13980HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 1012 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 905 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 792 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 704 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 840 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 739 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 646 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 568 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 620 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 491 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 430 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Core i9-13980HX

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Core i9-13980HX
Core i9-13980HX
The Core i9-13980HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,950 points. Launch price was $668.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Core i9-13980HX offers 24 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-13980HX has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-13980HX — a 7.5% clock advantage for the Core i9-13980HX (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-13980HX uses Raptor Lake-HX (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Core i9-13980HX's 45,950 — a 19.8% lead for the Core i9-13980HX. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13980HX.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i9-13980HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 24 / 32+71% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.5 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+59% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 36 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Raptor Lake-HX (2023) |
| PassMark | 37,655 | 45,950+22% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-13980HX uses FCBGA1964 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i5-13600K versus 5600 on the Core i9-13980HX — the Core i9-13980HX supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and Raptor Lake-HX (Core i9-13980HX).
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i9-13980HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA1964 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | 5600+111900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+104857500% | 192 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Core i9-13980HX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) and Intel UHD Graphics (Core i9-13980HX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i9-13980HX rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i9-13980HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Intel UHD Graphics |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Core i9-13980HX debuted at $668. On MSRP ($329 vs $668), the Core i5-13600K is $339 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600K delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 68.8 pts/$ for the Core i9-13980HX — making the Core i5-13600K the 49.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i9-13980HX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-51% | $668 |
| Performance per Dollar | 114.5+66% | 68.8 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













