
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Core i9-13900K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $270 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 17.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 97.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (37,655 vs 58,373).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 36 MB).
Core i9-13900K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 97.5 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Core i5-13600K
2022Core i9-13900K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $270 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 17.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 97.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (37,655 vs 58,373).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 36 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 97.5 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900K better than Core i5-13600K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i9-13900K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 325 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 211 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 281 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 112 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i9-13900K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 756 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 658 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 474 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 635 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 472 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 390 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 355 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 304 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 270 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i9-13900K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 765 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 628 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 468 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 570 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 426 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 503 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 441 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 336 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i9-13900K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 1034 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 926 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 812 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 722 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 859 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 757 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 663 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 582 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 634 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 568 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 503 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Core i9-13900K

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Core i9-13900K
Core i9-13900K
The Core i9-13900K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 58,373 points. Launch price was $589.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Core i9-13900K offers 24 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-13900K has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 5.7 GHz on the Core i9-13900K — a 11.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). Both are built on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture using a Intel 7 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Core i9-13900K's 58,373 — a 43.1% lead for the Core i9-13900K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i9-13900K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 24 / 32+71% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.7 GHz+12% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+17% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 36 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) |
| PassMark | 37,655 | 58,373+55% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 40,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,985 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 19,967 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and Intel Z790,Intel Z690 (Core i9-13900K).
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i9-13900K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) vs true (Core i9-13900K). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) and Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-13900K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop, Core i9-13900K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i9-13900K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | Desktop | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Core i9-13900K debuted at $599. On MSRP ($329 vs $599), the Core i5-13600K is $270 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600K delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 97.5 pts/$ for the Core i9-13900K — making the Core i5-13600K the 16% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i9-13900K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-45% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 114.5+17% | 97.5 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













