
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Core i9-12900T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $160 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $489 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 89.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 60.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $489 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
Core i9-12900T
2022Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (29,601 vs 37,655).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 60.5 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($489 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Core i5-13600K
2022Core i9-12900T
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $160 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $489 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 89.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 60.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $489 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (29,601 vs 37,655).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 60.5 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($489 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than Core i9-12900T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i9-12900T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 93 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i9-12900T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 120 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i9-12900T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 740 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 615 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 544 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 461 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 689 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 552 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 482 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 371 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 312 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i9-12900T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 740 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 740 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 666 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 591 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 737 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 488 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 518 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 361 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Core i9-12900T

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Core i9-12900T
Core i9-12900T
The Core i9-12900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 29,601 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Core i9-12900T offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i9-12900T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 4.9 GHz on the Core i9-12900T — a 4% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-12900T uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Core i9-12900T's 29,601 — a 24% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900T.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i9-12900T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 16 / 24+14% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+4% | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+150% | 1.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 30 MB (total)+25% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+60% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 37,655+27% | 29,601 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 22,809 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,331 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 12,116 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and LGA1700 (Core i9-12900T).
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i9-12900T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-13600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i9-12900T supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) and UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-12900T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i9-12900T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Core i9-12900T debuted at $489. On MSRP ($329 vs $489), the Core i5-13600K is $160 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600K delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 60.5 pts/$ for the Core i9-12900T — making the Core i5-13600K the 61.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i9-12900T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-33% | $489 |
| Performance per Dollar | 114.5+89% | 60.5 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













