
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Core i9-12900KS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $410 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $739 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 94.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 58.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $739 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 150W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (37,655 vs 43,528).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).
Core i9-12900KS
2022Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 58.9 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($739 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 150W vs 125W.
Core i5-13600K
2022Core i9-12900KS
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $410 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $739 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 94.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 58.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $739 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 150W, a 25W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (37,655 vs 43,528).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 58.9 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($739 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 150W vs 125W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-12900KS better than Core i5-13600K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i9-12900KS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i9-12900KS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 716 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 603 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 501 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 443 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 541 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 454 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 380 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 363 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 263 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i9-12900KS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 866 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 686 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 605 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 502 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 748 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 602 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 523 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 441 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 332 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i9-12900KS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 973 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 879 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 763 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 693 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 812 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 723 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 626 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 556 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 449 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 396 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Core i9-12900KS

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Core i9-12900KS
Core i9-12900KS
The Core i9-12900KS is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 43,528 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Core i9-12900KS offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i9-12900KS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 5.3 GHz on the Core i9-12900KS — a 3.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-12900KS (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-12900KS uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Core i9-12900KS's 43,528 — a 14.5% lead for the Core i9-12900KS. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900KS.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i9-12900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 16 / 24+14% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.3 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+3% | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 30 MB (total)+25% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+60% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 37,655 | 43,528+16% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 27,796 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,082 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and LGA1700 (Core i9-12900KS).
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i9-12900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Core i9-12900KS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) and UHD 770 (Core i9-12900KS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i9-12900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | UHD 770 |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Core i9-12900KS debuted at $739. On MSRP ($329 vs $739), the Core i5-13600K is $410 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600K delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 58.9 pts/$ for the Core i9-12900KS — making the Core i5-13600K the 64.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i9-12900KS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-55% | $739 |
| Performance per Dollar | 114.5+94% | 58.9 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













